The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Analysis of Substance Use Among Adolescents From Smaller Places
Abstract
This study examined trends in substance use among 12th grade students who live in smaller places. Subjects from smaller places were defined as those residing in nonmet‐ropolitan and metropolitan counties who reported growing up on a farm, in the country (i.e., living in an unincorporated rural area but not on a farm) or in a small town (i.e, living in a place with fewer than 50,000 residents that is not a suburb or located next to a larger place). Six types of smaller places were created from a cross‐tabulation of nonmetropolitan‐metropolitan status and where subjects reported growing up. Substance‐use rates among 12th graders residing in these six types of smaller places from 1976 to 1997 at three‐year intervals were compared, based on data available from the Monitoring the Future study. For past‐year alcohol use, some differences were found by place, with farm youth showing the lowest rates. Large differences were exhibited for past‐year marijuana use, both across nonmetropolitan‐metropolitan status and across youth from farm, country and small‐town locations within nonmetropolitan counties. Rates of past‐year illicit drug use were essentially the same regardless of location. Overall, when significant differences were found, most revealed less use for the more rural location.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
SOCIAL INTERACTION AND COMMUNITY CRIME: EXAMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF NEIGHBOR NETWORKS
BELLAIR, P. E. (1997) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1997.tb01235.x · Cited by 513
The Density of Acquaintanceship: An Overlooked Variable in Community Research?
Freudenburg, W. R. (1986) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228462 · Cited by 395
The Recent Revival of Widespread Population Growth in Nonmetropolitan Areas of the United States1
Johnson, K. M., & Beale, C. L. (1994) · Rural Sociology · doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00553.x · Cited by 189
Cronk, C. E., & Sarvela, P. D. (1997) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.87.5.760 · Cited by 139
Primary Socialization Theory. The Influence of the Community on Drug Use and Deviance. Ill
OETTING, E. R., Donnermeyer, J. F., & Deffenbacher, J. L. (1998) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826089809058948 · Cited by 104
Self-citationSocial Change in Rural Societies
Rogers, E. M. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 92
Anabolic steroid use among adolescents in a rural state.
Whitehead, R. D., CHILLAG, S. A., & Elliott, D. (1992) · PubMed · Cited by 59
Illegal Drug Use among Rural Adults: Mental Health Consequences and Treatment Utilization
Robertson, E. B., & Donnermeyer, J. F. (1997) · The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse · doi:10.3109/00952999709016890 · Cited by 52
Self-citationRural and Urban Problem Drinkers in Six Southern States
Booth, B. M., Ross, R. L., & ROST, K. M. (1999) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826089909037227 · Cited by 50
Health Concerns and Risk Behaviors of Rural Adolescents
Puskar, K. R., Tusaie‐Mumford, K., Sereika, S. M., et al. (1999) · Journal of Community Health Nursing · doi:10.1207/s15327655jchn1602_4 · Cited by 29
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Bachman JG., 1976, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Bachman JG., 1982, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Bachman JG., 1988, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Cleland CL., 1994, Rurality scores for US. counties, 1994.
- Conger RD., 1997, Rural substance abuse: State of knowledge and issues, 37
- Donnermeyer JF., 1992, Drug use in rural American communities, 31
- Edwards RW., 1997, Rural substance abuse: State of knowledge and issues, 53
- Johnston LD., 1979, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Johnston LD., 1991, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Johnston LD., 1985, Monitoring the future: A continuing study of American youth (12th grade survey)
- Lyman MD., 1998, Drugs and society: Causes, concepts and control.
- Oetting ER., 1997, Rural substance abuse: State of knowledge and issues, 90
- Weisheit RA., 1999, Crime and policing in rural and small‐town America.
Cited by
Lasebikan, V., Ola, B. A., & Ayinde, O. O. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00050 · Cited by 17
“These demonstration projects were part of a WHO strategy to address alcohol problems in developing countries and were conducted in health care settings that included hospital outpatients (17, 18) and rural settings (19).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Donnermeyer, J. F., & Scheer, S. D.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Rural Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 105-113
- ISSN
- 0890-765X (ISSN-L)
- 1748-0361
- OpenAlex
- W2108262243
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Rural Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
- Keywords
- adolescent substance use, rural youth, small towns, farm youth, nonmetropolitan counties, alcohol consumption, cannabis use, illicit drug use, urban-rural differences, grade 12 students, Monitoring the Future
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking, Humans, Rural Population, United States, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.