Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 37

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Association Between Rural‐Urban Continuum, Maternal Education and Adverse Birth Outcomes in Québec, Canada

Auger, Nathalie, Authier, Marie‐Andrée, Martinez, Jérôme, Daniel, Mark·2009·The Journal of Rural Health

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Context: Rural relative to urban area and low socioeconomic status (SES) are associated with adverse birth outcomes. Whether a graded association of increasing magnitude is present across the urban‐rural continuum, accounting for SES, is unclear. We examined the association between rural‐urban continuum, SES and adverse birth outcomes. Methods: Singleton births from 1999 to 2003 (n = 356,147) were linked to Québec municipalities ranked on a continuum of 3 urban and 4 rural areas based on population and economic base. Maternal education was used to represent SES. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for preterm birth (PTB), low birth weight (LBW), and small‐for‐gestational‐age (SGA) birth, accounting for municipality and individual‐level covariates. We used stratified analyses to examine interaction between SES and rural‐urban continuum. Findings: Relative to metropolitan area residence, living in small urban or rural areas was associated with adverse birth outcomes. Living in rural areas was associated with SGA birth (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05‐1.17) and LBW (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.05‐1.26), and living in small urban areas was associated with PTB (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.08‐1.20). Upon stratification by education, living in remote rural relative to metropolitan areas was associated with adverse birth outcomes among university educated mothers only, and living in small urban areas was associated with adverse birth outcomes among mothers with lesser but not higher education. An SES gradient was present in all rural‐urban areas, particularly for SGA birth. Conclusion: Differences in perinatal health exist across the rural‐urban continuum, and maternal education has a modifying influence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2009.00242.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2005.04.002 · DOI
  2. 2006, How healthy are rural Canadians? An assessment of their health status and health determinants
  3. 10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1675 · DOI
  4. Mitura V, 2003, The Health of rural Canadians: a rural‐urban comparison of health indicators, Rural and Small Town Canada Analysis Bulletin, 4, 1
  5. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90316-5 · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1525-1446.1999.00176.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00066.x · DOI
  8. 10.1097/01.ede.0000142149.34095.88 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/bmj.307.6917.1458 · DOI
  10. 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2000.tb01571.x · DOI
  11. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199702)20:1<61::AID-NUR7>3.0.CO;2-S · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00332-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1992.tb00348.x · DOI
  14. Martinez J, 2004, Does living in rural communities rather than cities really make a difference in people's health and wellness?
  15. 10.1007/s11524-005-9016-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2008.00938.x · DOI
  17. 10.1046/j.1365-3016.2000.00266.x · DOI
  18. 10.2105/AJPH.87.7.1113 · DOI
  19. Millar WJ, 1998, Maternal education and risk factors for small‐for‐gestational‐age births, Health Rep, 10, 47
  20. 10.2105/AJPH.91.11.1808 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00202-2 · DOI
  22. 10.1136/jech.2005.042853 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wilkins R., 2006, PCCF+ Version 4G: User's Guide
  24. 10.1542/peds.108.2.e35 · DOI
  25. McNiven C, 2002, Census metropolitan area and census agglomeration influenced zones (MIZ): a description of the methodology
  26. Statistics Canada, 2006, Low income cut‐offs for 2005 and low income Measures for 2004
  27. MacMillan HL, 1996, Aboriginal health, CMAJ, 155, 1569
  28. Adelson N, 2005, The embodiment of inequity, Can J Public Health, 96, s45, 10.1007/BF03403702 · DOI
  29. Joseph KS, 1996, Recent trend in Canadian infant mortality rates: effect of changes in registration of live newborns weighing less than 500 g, CMAJ, 155, 1047
  30. Goldstein H, 1999, Multilevel statistical Models
  31. 10.1136/jech.2004.029454 · DOI
  32. 10.1097/00001648-200011000-00012 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2008.00160.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.05.003 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e3180cac25d · DOI
  37. 10.1037/0278-6133.11.1.32 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2006.02256.x · DOI
  39. 10.1111/j.1442-200X.2007.02494.x · DOI
  40. Mitchel EA, 2002, Smoking, nicotine and tar risk of small for gestational age babies, Acta Paediatr, 91, 323, 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb01723.x · DOI
  41. 10.1093/ije/30.6.1233 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.12.003 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/10937400601034563 · DOI
  44. 10.1203/pdr.0b013e31802d77f0 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.neuro.2004.07.007 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Auger, N., Authier, M., Martinez, J., & Daniel, M.
Venue
The Journal of Rural Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
342-351
ISSN
  • 0890-765X
  • 1748-0361
Cited by
37
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.