Cited by 41Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesWildlife Ecology and Conservation

Husbandry of the Fennec fox: Fennecus zerda: environmental conditions influencing stereotypic behaviour

CARLSTEAD, KATHY·1991·International Zoo Yearbook

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1748-1090.1991.tb03487.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on keeper-animal interactions in zoos has received very little attention, with only a few studies attempting to evaluate this relationship.

    “In comparison to the research that has been conducted in the domestic animal industries, research on keeper–animal interactions in zoos has received very little attention [34], with only a few studies attempting to evaluate this relationship [35,36,37,38,39,40].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
CARLSTEAD, K.
Affiliations
Smithsonian Institution (US)
Corresponding author
CARLSTEAD, KATHY
Venue
International Zoo Yearbook
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
202-207
ISSN
  • 0074-9664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-1090
OpenAlex
W2061857509
Cited by
41
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Zoo Yearbook (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Keywords
fennec fox, captive husbandry, stereotypy, environmental factors, animal welfare, zoo animals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review