The role of reproductive technologies in zoos: Past, present and future
Abstract
Reproductive technologies have been playing a role in zoos for more than two decades. However, the value of these techniques has largely been misunderstood. There has been an over‐emphasis on hyperbole and the ‘quick‐fix’ (the attempted use of assisted‐breeding techniques to produce offspring rapidly) and too little prominence on the prerequisite need to understand fundamental reproductive processes. The real value of these technologies is in delving into species‐specific mechanisms that regulate reproductive success. Thus, the priority should always be using the technologies as tools to generate new knowledge that can then have applied benefits to management, ex situ or in situ. Models of using this strategy to develop successful assisted‐breeding programmes are discussed, as well as the importance of integrating science between researchers and animal managers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many reproductive technologies that are commonplace in domestic species are now being tried and tested with animals in zoos and aquariums.
“With the advent of the 21st century, many reproductive technologies that have become commonplace in the reproduction of domestic species are now being tried and tested with animals in zoos and aquariums [32,84].”
From The Concept of Agency, Animal Wellbeing, and the Practical Realities of Ex Situ Breeding Programs in Zoos and Aquariums (2024) · cites this paper as [84]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Norman, M., & Brando, S. (2024) · Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens · doi:10.3390/jzbg5040038 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“With the advent of the 21st century, many reproductive technologies that have become commonplace in the reproduction of domestic species are now being tried and tested with animals in zoos and aquariums [32,84].”
- Authors
- WILDT, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- WILDT, D. E.
- Venue
- International Zoo Yearbook
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111-118
- ISSN
- 0074-9664 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-1090
- OpenAlex
- W2054275505
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Zoo Yearbook (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Keywords
- reproductive technology, zoos, assisted breeding, captive breeding, ex situ conservation, in situ conservation, reproductive success, zoo management, research-practice integration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review