The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3. Bentham in a Box: Technology Assessment and Health Care Allocation
Abstract
Jeremy Bentham, the founding father of utilitarianism, would have been delighted by technology assessment. Contemporary health policy planners are, unwittingly, aping the great man's felicific calculus, as they attempt to discern the efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance imaging or cardiac bypass surgery or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. They try to design methods to calculate the effects of these technologies on mortality and morbidity and to compare the costs of one to the costs of alternatives. In recent years, the methods of technology assessment have been refined, but they remain, in essence, a copy of Bentham's proposal to plan and effect a rational course of action and to create a rational world. The great philosopher and social reformer is, of course, still with us in a dessicated form. He bequeathed his body to the fellows of University College, London, and to this day his mummified figure is encased in a glass box, sitting in his favorite chair, dressed in his own clothes, his waxen face peering out with a bemused smile.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Daniels, N. (1985) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511624971 · Cited by 1,264
Cited by
Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults
Adhikari, N. K., Fowler, R. A., Bhagwanjee, S., & Rubenfeld, G. D. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60446-1 · Cited by 1,304
Principles for allocation of scarce medical interventions
Persad, G., Wertheimer, A., & Emanuel, E. J. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60137-9 · Cited by 929
Setting Health Care Priorities in Oregon: Cost-effectiveness Meets the Rule of Rescue
Hadorn, D. C. (1991) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1991.03460170072036 · Cited by 438
McKie, J., & Richardson, J. (2003) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00244-7 · Cited by 370
Bukhman, G., Mocumbi, A. O., Atun, R., Becker, A. E., Bhutta, Z., Binagwaho, A., Clinton, C., Coates, M. M., Dain, K., Ezzati, M., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31907-3 · Cited by 285
Metadata
- Authors
- Jonsen, A. R.
- Venue
- Law, Medicine and Health Care
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1986-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 172-174
- ISSN
- 0277-8459 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-7878
- OpenAlex
- W2021023562
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3. Bentham in a Box: Technology Assessment and Health Care Allocation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1986.tb00974.x
- The paper
- Jonsen, A. R. (1986). 3. Bentham in a Box: Technology Assessment and Health Care Allocation. Law, Medicine and Health Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.1986.tb00974.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.