The DOI matches its Crossref record.
ESTIMATES OF SPERM WHALE ABUNDANCE IN THE NORTHEASTERN TEMPERATE PACIFIC FROM A COMBINED ACOUSTIC AND VISUAL SURVEY
Open accessAbstract
We estimate the abundance of sperm whales in a 7.8 million km 2 study area in the eastern temperate North Pacific using data from a ship‐based acoustic and visual line‐transect survey in spring 1997. Sperm whales were detected acoustically using a hydrophone array towed at 15 km/h and 100 m depth. The hydrophone array was towed for 14,500 km, and locations were estimated acoustically for 45 distinct sperm whale groups. Whales producing slow clicks (>2‐s period) were detected at greater distance (up to 37 km), and the estimation of effective strip widths was stratified based on initial click period. Visual survey effort (using 25° binoculars and naked eyes) covered 8,100 km in Beaufort sea states 0–5 and resulted in only eight sightings. The effective strip width for visual detections was estimated from previous surveys conducted using the same methods and similar vessels in the eastern Pacific. Estimated sperm whale abundance in the study area was not significantly different between acoustic (32,100, CV = 0.36) and visual (26,300, CV = 0.81) detection methods. Acoustic techniques substantially increased the number of sperm whales detected on this line‐transect survey by increasing the range of detection and allowing nighttime surveys; however, visual observations were necessary for estimating group size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Estimating animal population density using passive acoustics
Marques, T. A., Thomas, L., Martin, S. W., Mellinger, D. K., Ward, J. A., Moretti, D. J., Harris, D., & Tyack, P. L. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12001 · Cited by 746
An Overview of Fixed Passive Acoustic Observation Methods for Cetaceans
Mellinger, D., Stafford, K., Moore, S., Dziak, R., & Matsumoto, H. (2007) · Oceanography · doi:10.5670/oceanog.2007.03 · Cited by 586
Techniques for cetaceanhabitat modeling
Redfern, J., Ferguson, M., Becker, E., Hyrenbach, K., Good, C., Barlow, J., Kaschner, K., Baumgartner, M., Forney, K., Ballance, L., et al. (2006) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps310271 · Cited by 451
Self-citationAcoustic indices respond to specific marine mammal vocalizations and sources of anthropogenic noise
Ferguson, E. L., Clayton, H. M., & Sakai, T. (2023) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2023.1025464 · Cited by 15
“Two click classi fi ers were used for the detection of echolocation clicks from sperm whales to differentiate between “ regular ” and “ slow ” clicks (Weilgart & Whitehead, 1988; Barlow & Taylor, 2005).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Barlow, J., & Taylor, B. L.
- Venue
- Marine Mammal Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 429-445
- ISSN
- 0824-0469 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-7692
- OpenAlex
- W2060884411
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ESTIMATES OF SPERM WHALE ABUNDANCE IN THE NORTHEASTERN TEMPERATE PACIFIC FROM A COMBINED ACOUSTIC AND VISUAL SURVEY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2005.tb01242.x
- The paper
- Barlow, J., & Taylor, B. L. (2005). ESTIMATES OF SPERM WHALE ABUNDANCE IN THE NORTHEASTERN TEMPERATE PACIFIC FROM A COMBINED ACOUSTIC AND VISUAL SURVEY. Marine Mammal Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2005.tb01242.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.