Cited by 44Identification and Quantification in FoodMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsViral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects

Essential role for gene profiling analysis in the authentication of human cell lines

YOSHINO, Kaori, IIMURA, Emi, SAIJO, Kaoru, IWASE, Shigeru, FUKAMI, Kaoru, OHNO, Tadao, OBATA, Yuichi, NAKAMURA, Yukio·2006·Human Cell

Abstract

Cross-contamination between cultured cell lines can result in the generation of erroneous scientific data. Hence, it is very important to eliminate cell lines that are of an origin different from that being claimed. Inter-species contamination can be detected by various established methods, such as karyotype and isozyme analyses. However, it has been impossible to detect intraspecies cross-contamination prior to the development of technology to detect differences between cell lines at the molecular level. Recently, profiling of short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms has been established as a method for the analyses of gene polymorphism. Gene profiling by STR polymorphism (STR profiling) is a simple and reliable method to identify individual cell lines. Each human cell line currently provided by the Cell Engineering Division of the RIKEN BioResource Center was analyzed by STR profiling to authenticate its identity. We found that more than 10 human cell lines out of approximately 400 were in fact identical to a different cell line deposited in the collection, and therefore had been misidentified. We conclude that STR profiling is a useful and powerful method for eliminating cell lines that have been misidentified by cross-contamination or by other causes. Hence, STR profiling of human cell lines used in published research will likely be a prerequisite for publication in the future, so that the problem of misidentification of cell lines can be eliminated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-0774.2005.00007.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Four examples in the non-Chinese model were notably false cell lines (U-251, Hep2, Ej and HBL-100) for which the actual identity had been previously reported, contributing 6.3% (4/64) of the contamination rate.

    “including four examples that were notably false cell lines (U-251, Hep2, Ej and HBL-100) for which the actual identity had been previously reported [8–12], contributing 6.3% (4/64) of the contamination rate.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YOSHINO, K., IIMURA, E., SAIJO, K., IWASE, S., FUKAMI, K., OHNO, T., OBATA, Y., & NAKAMURA, Y.
Affiliations
RIKEN BioResource Research Center (JP)
Corresponding author
NAKAMURA, Yukio
Venue
Human Cell
Published
2006-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
  • 0914-7470 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-0774
OpenAlex
W2012706889
Cited by
44
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
Keywords
human cell lines, cell line authentication, cross-contamination, short tandem repeat profiling, cell line misidentification
MeSH terms
Cell Line, Cell Separation, Female, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Specimen Handling, Tissue Banks, Microsatellite Repeats, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review