Essential role for gene profiling analysis in the authentication of human cell lines
Abstract
Cross-contamination between cultured cell lines can result in the generation of erroneous scientific data. Hence, it is very important to eliminate cell lines that are of an origin different from that being claimed. Inter-species contamination can be detected by various established methods, such as karyotype and isozyme analyses. However, it has been impossible to detect intraspecies cross-contamination prior to the development of technology to detect differences between cell lines at the molecular level. Recently, profiling of short tandem repeat (STR) polymorphisms has been established as a method for the analyses of gene polymorphism. Gene profiling by STR polymorphism (STR profiling) is a simple and reliable method to identify individual cell lines. Each human cell line currently provided by the Cell Engineering Division of the RIKEN BioResource Center was analyzed by STR profiling to authenticate its identity. We found that more than 10 human cell lines out of approximately 400 were in fact identical to a different cell line deposited in the collection, and therefore had been misidentified. We conclude that STR profiling is a useful and powerful method for eliminating cell lines that have been misidentified by cross-contamination or by other causes. Hence, STR profiling of human cell lines used in published research will likely be a prerequisite for publication in the future, so that the problem of misidentification of cell lines can be eliminated.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Four examples in the non-Chinese model were notably false cell lines (U-251, Hep2, Ej and HBL-100) for which the actual identity had been previously reported, contributing 6.3% (4/64) of the contamination rate.
“including four examples that were notably false cell lines (U-251, Hep2, Ej and HBL-100) for which the actual identity had been previously reported [8–12], contributing 6.3% (4/64) of the contamination rate.”
From Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines (2017) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Cross-contamination of cells in culture
Nelson-Rees, W. A., Daniels, D. W., & Flandermeyer, R. R. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6451928 · Cited by 329 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Check your cultures! A list of cross‐contaminated or misidentified cell lines
Capes‐Davis, A., Theodosopoulos, G., Atkin, I., Drexler, H. G., Kohara, A., MacLeod, R. A. F., Masters, J. R., Nakamura, Y., Reid, Y. A., Reddel, R. R., et al. (2010) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.25242 · Cited by 520 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Costs of using Unauthenticated, Over-Passaged Cell Lines: How Much more Data do we Need?
Hughes, P., Marshall, D., Reid, Y., Parkes, H., & Gelber, C. (2007) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000112598 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
Persistent use of “false” cell lines
Lacroix, M. (2008) · International Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1002/ijc.23233 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Investigation of Cross-Contamination and Misidentification of 278 Widely Used Tumor Cell Lines
Huang, Y., Liu, Y., Zheng, C., & Shen, C. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170384 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
- Authors
- YOSHINO, K., IIMURA, E., SAIJO, K., IWASE, S., FUKAMI, K., OHNO, T., OBATA, Y., & NAKAMURA, Y.
- Affiliations
- RIKEN BioResource Research Center (JP)
- Corresponding author
- NAKAMURA, Yukio
- Venue
- Human Cell
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-48
- ISSN
- 0914-7470 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-0774
- OpenAlex
- W2012706889
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Human Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
- Keywords
- human cell lines, cell line authentication, cross-contamination, short tandem repeat profiling, cell line misidentification
- MeSH terms
- Cell Line, Cell Separation, Female, Humans, Male, Polymorphism, Genetic, Specimen Handling, Tissue Banks, Microsatellite Repeats, Gene Expression Profiling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review