Cited by 77Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

PROGNOSTIC CRITERIA IN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS

Bauer, H. J., Firnhaber, W., Winkler, W.·1965·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20234.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bauer, H. J., Firnhaber, W., & Winkler, W.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1965-03
Volume
122
Issue
1
Pages
542-551
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W1967276269
Cited by
77
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, prognosis, prognostic criteria, disease outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Humans, Multiple Sclerosis, Prognosis, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review