Cited by 20Phonetics and Phonology ResearchVoice and Speech DisordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ventilatory implications of phonation and phonatory implications of ventilation.

Otis, Arthur B., Clark, Ronald G.·1968·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1968.tb56755.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Otis, A. B., & Clark, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1968-11
Volume
155
Issue
1
Pages
122-128
ISSN
  • 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6632
OpenAlex
W2016124378
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
phonation, ventilation, respiratory mechanics, airway resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review