CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

COAL WORKERS' PNEUMOCONIOSIS IN SOUTH AFRICA

Goldstein, B., Webster, I.·1972·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40197.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40197.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. South Africa (Union)., 1959, Geological Survey. The mineral resources of the Union of South Africa, 457
  2. Republic of South Africa, 1970, Minerals; a report, Jan.-Mar., 15
  3. Kitto P. H., 1952, A modified form of the thermal precipitator, J. Chem. Met. Mining Soc. S. Afr., 52, 284
  4. Kitson G. H. J., 1968, Photo‐electric readings. Their significance for dust control on collieries, J.S. Afr. Inst. Mining Metallurgy., 69, 130
  5. Kitson G. H. J., 1969, Photo‐electric readings. Their significance for dust control on collieries, Discussion. J. S. Afr. Inst. Mining Metallurgy, 69, 595
  6. Republic of South Africa, 1962, The pneumoconiosis compensation act, 11
  7. Chatgidakis C. B., 1963, An autopsy survey of Bantu South African coal miners, Brit. J. Ind. Med., 20, 236

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Goldstein, B., & Webster, I.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1972-12
Volume
200
Issue
1
Pages
306-315
ISSN
  • 0077-8923
  • 1749-6632
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40197.x
Cited by
11
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 12433 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COAL WORKERS' PNEUMOCONIOSIS IN SOUTH AFRICA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40197.x
The paper
Goldstein, B., & Webster, I. (1972). COAL WORKERS' PNEUMOCONIOSIS IN SOUTH AFRICA. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1972.tb40197.x