CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

AFRICA IN CUBA: A QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE AFRICAN POPULATION IN THE ISLAND OF CUBA*

Fraginals, Manuel Moreno·1977·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb47743.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb47743.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cuban plantation slavery had a jail-like structure, particularly in slave-management practices adopted to contain slave activities.

    “One of the most striking features of the Cuban plantation is what historian Moreno Fraginals referred to as 'its jail-like structure ' (1977: 189).This characterization aptly describes many slave-management practices adopted in Cuba, particularly those implemented to contain slave activities.”

    From Slavery and spatial dialectics on Cuban coffee plantations (2001) · cites this paper as Moreno Fraginals 1977: 189

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fraginals, M. M.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1977-06
Volume
292
Issue
1
Pages
187-201
ISSN
  • 0077-8923
  • 1749-6632
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb47743.x
Cited by
9
References
0
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 10790 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review