Why Porpoise Trainers Are Not Dolphin Lovers: Real and False Communication in the Operant Setting
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The presumed high intelligence of whales is sheer speculation rather than established fact.
“By taking Lilly as their source and ignoring all scientists of a different opinion, D'Amato and Chopra forget that this presumed high intelligence of whales is sheer speculation rather than established fact.”
From Management by Totemization: Whale Symbolism and the Anti-Whaling Campaign (1993) · cites this paper as Pryor, 1981
It is not generally accepted that dolphin and human brains are identical.
“It is by no means generally accepted that the dolphin and human brains are identical, however.”
From Management by Totemization: Whale Symbolism and the Anti-Whaling Campaign (1993) · cites this paper as Pryor, 1981
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Management by Totemization: Whale Symbolism and the Anti-Whaling Campaign
Kalland, A. (1993) · ARCTIC · doi:10.14430/arctic1333 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- PRYOR, K.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- PRYOR, KAREN
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 364
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 137-143
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2078064800
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Marine animal studies overview
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
- Keywords
- human-animal communication, operant conditioning, animal training, cetacean behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
