The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Preening and Associated Comfort Behavior in Birdsa
Abstract
41seem to be a kind of spare-time activity that is performed whenever there is nothing more important to do.Gulls in the wild, subject as they are to all kinds of selective pressures, spend less time preening than well-provided-for, aviary caged gulls (15070 versus 26% of their time, p < 0.01; own observations).In contexts that make little demand on the animals, and in an undisturbed environment, rhythmicities with periods on the order of several tens of minutes may be predominant in determining the occurrence of preening. 5Over and above these short cycles, a diurnal cycle is often very apparent" (but compare ref.3).It is not certain whether it is directly due to a central circadian rhythm, or secondary to the dark-light cycle.It is well documented that periodic external stimuli such as light pulses can entrain the short-term cyclic occurrence of preening. 7ome preening-related behavior can, however, become strongly stimulus dependent in particular situations.I have observed skylarks to respond forthwith with sunbathing behavior during prolonged cloudy-foggy weather spells whenever the sun managed to break through and to immediately begin with rainbathing behavior during extended hot-dry weather spells whenever it began to drizzle."Deprivation of the opportunity to dustbathe leads to a cumulating increase in the probability that chickens will show this behavior as soon as dust is made available.8 There are also, undoubtedly, events that require immediate preening attention by birds.This might be the case with the more offensive activities of integument parasites,9 disturbances due to feather loss and growth (molting seems to intensify preening in pigeons), and disturbances due to wind gusts or the behavioral activities of the bird itself or those of other birds.Particularly short duration bouts of preening are thought to be primarily elicited by such acute cutaneous, and sometimes visual, stimuli.to This evidence indicates that local somesthetic stimuli may, on the one hand, trigger and direct preening.On the other hand, they are probably not essential for preening to occur and to be structured.Lefebvre and Jolyl1 (see also ref. 5), for example, argue on the basis of a detailed analysis of extensive observational data that the longer preening bouts of kestrels are not initiated by any particular stimulus.They also conclude that
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reduced preening in the water also suggests that contact with visitors may be threatening for little penguins since preening behaviour is a comfort behaviour that is more likely to occur when animals are not threatened [47,48,49,50].”
From Effect of Covering a Visitor Viewing Area Window on the Behaviour of Zoo-Housed Little Penguins (Eudyptula minor) (2020) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Presumably, comfort behaviours such as preening are generally more likely to occur when the animal is not threatened [19,48,49,50].”
From Effects of Regulating Visitor Viewing Proximity and the Intensity of Visitor Behaviour on Little Penguin (Eudyptula minor) Behaviour and Welfare (2019) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mirror-Induced Behavior in the Magpie (Pica pica): Evidence of Self-Recognition
Prior, H., Schwarz, A., & Güntürkün, O. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060202 · Cited by 586
Feather damaging behaviour in parrots: A review with consideration of comparative aspects
van Zeeland, Y. R. A., Spruit, B. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Riedstra, B., van Hierden, Y. M., Buitenhuis, B., Korte, S. M., & Lumeij, J. T. (2009) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.006 · Cited by 139
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J., Fanson, K. V., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2019) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani9060285 · Cited by 61
Chiew, S. J., Butler, K. L., Sherwen, S. L., Coleman, G. J., Melfi, V., Burns, A., & Hemsworth, P. H. (2020) · Animals · doi:10.3390/ani10071224 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- DELIUS, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
- Corresponding author
- DELIUS, JUAN D.
- ORCID
- DELIUS, JUAN D.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-05
- Volume
- 525
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-55
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2043680369
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Keywords
- preening, comfort behavior, birds, bird behavior, self-grooming
- MeSH terms
- Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Animals, Apomorphine, Behavior, Animal, Displacement, Psychological, Dopamine, Grooming
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review