Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carcinogenicity of Chrysotile Asbestos: Evidence from Cohort Studies

DEMENT, JOHN M.·1991·Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb24440.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb24440.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1986, Airborne Asbestos‐Health Assessment Update
  2. World Health Organization, 1987, IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC Monographs Volumes 1 to 42; Supp:7.: 106–116
  3. Gibbs G. W., 1980, Biological Effects of Mineral Fiber, 69
  4. Green F. H. Y., 1986, Pulmonary fibrosis and asbestos exposure in chrysotile asbestos textile workers: Preliminary results, Accomp. Oncol., 1, 59
  5. Sebastien P., 1979, Dusts and Diseases, 65
  6. Morinaga K., 1989, Non‐Occupational Exposure to Mineral Fibers, 438
  7. World Health Organization, 1984, Part 2: Carbon Blacks, Mineral Oils and Some Nitroarenes, 87

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
DEMENT, J. M.
Venue
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-12
Volume
643
Issue
1
Pages
15-23
ISSN
  • 0077-8923
  • 1749-6632
DOI
10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb24440.x
Cited by
11
References
29
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5495 d)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.