The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Central Neuroplasticity and Pathological Pain
Abstract
A bstract: The traditional specificity theory of pain perception holds that pain involves a direct transmission system from somatic receptors to the brain. The amount of pain perceived, moreover, is assumed to be directly proportional to the extent of injury. Recent research, however, indicates far more complex mechanisms. Clinical and experimental evidence shows that noxious stimuli may sensitize central neural structures involved in pain perception. Salient clinical examples of these effects include amputees with pains in a phantom limb that are similar or identical to those felt in the limb before it was amputated, and patients after surgery who have benefited from preemptive analgesia which blocks the surgery‐induced afferent barrage and/or its central consequences. Experimental evidence of these changes is illustrated by the development of sensitization, wind‐up, or expansion of receptive fields of CNS neurons, as well as by the enhancement of flexion reflexes and the persistence of pain or hyperalgesia after inputs from injured tissues are blocked. It is clear from the material presented that the perception of pain does not simply involve a moment‐to‐moment analysis of afferent noxious input, but rather involves a dynamic process that is influenced by the effects of past experiences. Sensory stimuli act on neural systems that have been modified by past inputs, and the behavioral output is significantly influenced by the “memory” of these prior events. An increased understanding of the central changes induced by peripheral injury or noxious stimulation should lead to new and improved clinical treatment for the relief and prevention of pathological pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., Vaccarino, A. L., & Melzack, R. (1993) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(93)90161-h · Cited by 1,966
Self-citationAcute Pain after Thoracic Surgery Predicts Long-Term Post-Thoracotomy Pain
Katz, J., Jackson, M., Kavanagh, B. P., & Sandler, A. N. (1996) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-199603000-00009 · Cited by 915
Self-citation
Cited by
The Long-term Consequence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Meniscus Injuries: Osteoarthritis
Lohmander, L. S., Englund, P. M., Dahl, L. L., & Roos, E. M. (2007) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546507307396 · Cited by 2,344
Overtreating chronic back pain: time to back off?
Deyo, R. A., Mirza, S. K., Turner, J. A., & Martin, B. I. (2009) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2009.01.080102 · Cited by 796
EAU Guidelines on Chronic Pelvic Pain
Fall, M., Baranowski, A. P., Elneil, S., Engeler, D., Hughes, J., Messelink, E. J., Oberpenning, F., & de C. Williams, A. C. (2010) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.08.020 · Cited by 579
Suvinen, T. I., Reade, P. C., Kemppainen, P., Könönen, M., & Dworkin, S. F. (2005) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.01.012 · Cited by 494
Chronic pelvic pain and endometriosis: translational evidence of the relationship and implications
Stratton, P., & Berkley, K. J. (2011) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmq050 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Melzack, R., Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., & Vaccarino, A. L.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 933
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-174
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2086003460
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Central Neuroplasticity and Pathological Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05822.x
- The paper
- Melzack, R., Coderre, T. J., Katz, J., & Vaccarino, A. L. (2001). Central Neuroplasticity and Pathological Pain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05822.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.