The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms
Abstract
The patterns of biodiversity changes in cities are now fairly well established, although diversity changes in temperate cities are much better studied than cities in other climate zones. Generally, plant species richness often increases in cities due to importation of exotic species, whereas animal species richness declines. Abundances of some groups, especially birds and arthropods, often increase in urban areas despite declines in species richness. Although several models have been proposed for biodiversity change, the processes underlying the patterns of biodiversity in cities are poorly understood. We argue that humans directly control plants but relatively few animals and microbes—the remaining biological community is determined by this plant “template” upon which natural ecological and evolutionary processes act. As a result, conserving or reconstructing natural habitats defined by vegetation within urban areas is no guarantee that other components of the biological community will follow suit. Understanding the human‐controlled and natural processes that alter biodiversity is essential for conserving urban biodiversity. This urban biodiversity will comprise a growing fraction of the world's repository of biodiversity in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system
Crooks, K. R., & Soulé, M. E. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/23028 · Cited by 1,721
WHAT IS THE OBSERVED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SPECIES RICHNESS AND PRODUCTIVITY?
Mittelbach, G. G., Steiner, C. F., Scheiner, S. M., Gross, K. L., Reynolds, H. L., Waide, R. B., Willig, M. R., Dodson, S. I., & Gough, L. (2001) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[2381:witorb]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,650
Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity.
Fuller, R. A., Irvine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2007) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 · Cited by 1,549
Mcintyre, N. E., Knowles-Yánez, K., & Hope, D. (2000) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009540018553 · Cited by 281
The city-fox phenomenon: genetic consequences of a recent colonization of urban habitat
Wandeler, P., Funk, S. M., Largiadèr, C. R., Gloor, S., & Breitenmoser, U. (2003) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01768.x · Cited by 189
Cited by
The role of ‘nativeness’ in urban greening to support animal biodiversity
Berthon, K., Thomas, F., & Bekessy, S. (2021) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103959 · Cited by 202
CityNet—Deep learning tools for urban ecoacoustic assessment
Fairbrass, A. J., Firman, M., Williams, C., Brostow, G. J., Titheridge, H., & Jones, K. E. (2019) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13114 · Cited by 98
Higgins, S. L., Thomas, F., Goldsmith, B., Brooks, S. J., Hassall, C., Harlow, J., Stone, D., Völker, S., & White, P. (2019) · WIREs Water · doi:10.1002/wat2.1339 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Faeth, S. H., Bang, C., & Saari, S.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03
- Volume
- 1223
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-81
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W1776391755
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.