New approaches for treating staphylococcal biofilm infections
Abstract
Bacteria of the genus Staphylococcus are a prominent cause of acute and chronic infections. The ability of the staphylococci to establish biofilms has been linked to the persistence of chronic infections, which has drawn considerable interest from researchers over the past decade. Biofilms can be defined as sessile communities of surface‐attached cells encased in an extracellular matrix, and treatment of bacteria in this mode of growth is challenging due to the resistance of biofilm structures to both antimicrobials and host defenses. In this review of the literature, we introduce Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms and summarize current antibiotic treatment approaches for staphylococcal biofilm infections. We also review recent studies on alternative strategies for preventing biofilm formation and dispersing established biofilms, including matrix‐degrading enzymes, small‐molecule approaches, and manipulation of natural staphylococcal disassembly mechanisms. While research on staphylococcal biofilm development is still in its early stages, new discoveries in the field hold promise for improved therapies that target staphylococcal biofilm infections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For medical device applications, focus has been on antibacterial and antibiofilm properties, especially for bacteria that commonly cause CRBSIs, such as S. epidermidis, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa.
“However, for medical device applications, the focus has thus far been on its antibacterial/antibiofilm properties, especially for the bacteria that most commonly cause CRBSIs (catheter related bloodstream infections), such as Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa).66,103”
From Recent advances in thromboresistant and antimicrobial polymers for biomedical applications: just say yes to nitric oxide (NO) (2016) · cites this paper as [66]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 168 · Cited by 288
- Authors
- Kiedrowski, M. R., & Horswill, A. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Horswill, Alexander R.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 1241
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-121
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2097786095
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 168
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI078921, P01AI083211, AI083211, AI-078921)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- staphylococcal biofilms, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, biofilm-associated infections, antibiotic resistance, biofilm dispersal, biofilm inhibition, chronic infection, host defense
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, Humans, Protein Synthesis Inhibitors, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Tetracyclines, Prosthesis-Related Infections, Biofilms, Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors, Quorum Sensing, Catheter-Related Infections, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enzyme Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review