The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Draft consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Shwachman‐Diamond syndrome
Abstract
Shwachman‐Diamond syndrome (SDS) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by pancreatic exocrine insufficiency and bone marrow failure, often associated with neurodevelopmental and skeletal abnormalities. Mutations in the SBDS gene have been shown to cause SDS. The purpose of this document is to provide draft guidelines for diagnosis, evaluation of organ and system abnormalities, and treatment of hematologic, pancreatic, dietary, dental, skeletal, and neurodevelopmental complications. New recommendations regarding diagnosis and management are presented, reflecting advances in understanding the genetic basis and clinical manifestations of the disease based on the consensus of experienced clinicians from Canada, Europe, and the United States. Whenever possible, evidence‐based conclusions are made, but as with other rare diseases, the data on SDS are often anecdotal. The authors welcome comments from readers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult aplastic anaemia
Killick, S. B., Bown, N., Cavenagh, J., Dokal, I., Foukaneli, T., Hill, A., Hillmen, P., Ireland, R., Kulasekararaj, A., Mufti, G., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/bjh.13853 · Cited by 749
Fanconi anaemia and cancer: an intricate relationship
Nalepa, G., & Clapp, D. W. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2017.116 · Cited by 389
On-chip recapitulation of clinical bone marrow toxicities and patient-specific pathophysiology
Chou, D. B., Frismantas, V., Milton, Y., David, R., Pop-Damkov, P., Ferguson, D., MacDonald, A., Vargel Bölükbaşı, Ö., Joyce, C. E., Moreira Teixeira, L. S., et al. (2020) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-019-0495-z · Cited by 294
Self-citationTourlakis, M. E., Zhang, S., Ball, H. L., Gandhi, R., Liu, H., Zhong, J., Yuan, J. S., Guidos, C. J., Durie, P. R., & Rommens, J. M. (2015) · PLOS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1005288 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dror, Y., Donadieu, J., Koglmeier, J., Dodge, J., Toiviainen‐Salo, S., Makitie, O., Kerr, E., Zeidler, C., Shimamura, A., Shah, N., Cipolli, M., Kuijpers, T., Durie, P., Rommens, J., Siderius, L., & Liu, J. M.
- Venue
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 1242
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 40-55
- ISSN
- 0077-8923 (ISSN-L)
- 1749-6632
- OpenAlex
- W2126366711
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Draft consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Shwachman‐Diamond syndrome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06349.x
- The paper
- Dror, Y., Donadieu, J., Koglmeier, J., Dodge, J., Toiviainen‐Salo, S., Makitie, O., Kerr, E., Zeidler, C., Shimamura, A., Shah, N., Cipolli, M., Kuijpers, T., Durie, P., Rommens, J., Siderius, L., & Liu, J. M. (2011). Draft consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of Shwachman‐Diamond syndrome. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06349.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.