Looking Beyond English: Linguistic Inquiry for English Language Learners
Abstract
This paper reports on a pilot project that explored the potential of linguistic inquiry in a high school English as a Second Language (ESL) class. In class meetings across the school year, students worked collaboratively to investigate noun phrase pluralization, language acquisition, writing systems, and translation in their own and other languages. Classroom observations and students’ oral and written work provide evidence that: Examining the structures of the spoken and written languages represented in the ESL classroom captures students’ interest and engages them in critical inquiry about the nature of linguistic knowledge and their beliefs about language. The cross‐linguistic analysis of students’ home languages validates their languages in the school context, defining them as a rich resource worthy of study, rather than as a hindrance to education. These findings are of particular significance in this time of English‐only education in the United States, when students’ home languages are often rejected in schools.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings of this study align with previous research studies that morphological knowledge builds the ability to understand complex lexemes and enhances writing and reading competence.
“The findings of this study align with previous research studies that morphological knowledge builds the ability to understand complex lexemes and enhances writing and reading competence (Ginsberg et al. 2011;Wagner, 2017).”
From Transformative impacts of explicit morphological instruction on irregular inflectional acquisition in Saudi EFL learners (2024) · cites this paper as Ginsberg et al. 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmed Badawi, M. F. (2019) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v12n4p166 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Khan, A. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03610-4 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“Morphological knowledge builds the ability to understand complex lexemes and enhances writing and reading competence (Ginsberg et al. 2011).”
Wahid, R., & Farooq, O. (2019) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.24093/awej/vol10no1.21 · Cited by 2
- Authors
- Ginsberg, D., Honda, M., & O’Neil, W.
- Affiliations
- Georgetown University (US)
- Wheelock College (US)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- ORCID
- Ginsberg, Daniel
- Venue
- Language and Linguistics Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 249-264
- ISSN
- 1749-818X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1523512156
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 8.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language and Linguistics Compass (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Linguistic and Sociocultural Studies
- Keywords
- linguistic inquiry, English as a second language, English language learners, cross-linguistic analysis, language acquisition, writing systems, translation, English-only education, collaborative inquiry, language beliefs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review