The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb
Abstract
The landscape of Internet mapping technologies has changed dramatically since 2005. New techniques are being used and new terms have been invented and entered the lexicon such as: mash‐ups, crowdsourcing, neogeography and geostack. A whole range of websites and communities from the commercial Google Maps to the grassroots OpenStreetMap, and applications such as Platial, also have emerged. In their totality, these new applications represent a step change in the evolution of the area of Internet geographic applications (which some have termed the GeoWeb ). The nature of this change warrants an explanation and an overview, as it has implications both for geographers and the public notion of Geography. This article provides a critical review of this newly emerging landscape, starting with an introduction to the concepts, technologies and structures that have emerged over the short period of intense innovation. It introduces the non‐technical reader to them, suggests reasons for the neologism, explains the terminology, and provides a perspective on the current trends. Case studies are used to demonstrate this Web Mapping 2.0 era, and differentiate it from the previous generation of Internet mapping. Finally, the implications of these new techniques and the challenges they pose to geographic information science, geography and society at large are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Geo-Wiki: An online platform for improving global land cover
Fritz, S., McCallum, I., Schill, C., Perger, C., See, L., Schepaschenko, D., van der Velde, M., Kraxner, F., & Obersteiner, M. (2012) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.11.015 · Cited by 332
Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb
Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.08.003 · Cited by 226
Rural resilience in a digital society: Editorial
Roberts, E., Beel, D., Philip, L., & Townsend, L. (2017) · Journal of Rural Studies · doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.010 · Cited by 127
Data Matter(s): Legitimacy, Coding, and Qualifications-of-Life
Wilson, M. W. (2011) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d7910 · Cited by 79
Gupta, N., Blair, S., & Nicholas, R. (2020) · Journal of Field Archaeology · doi:10.1080/00934690.2020.1713969 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C.
- Venue
- Geography Compass
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-11
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2011-2039
- ISSN
- 1749-8198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117769867
- Cited by
- 567
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 158.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x
- The paper
- Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web Mapping 2.0: The Neogeography of the GeoWeb. Geography Compass. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00167.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.