The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Canola Proteins for Human Consumption: Extraction, Profile, and Functional Properties
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: Canola protein isolate has been suggested as an alternative to other proteins for human food use due to a balanced amino acid profile and potential functional properties such as emulsifying, foaming, and gelling abilities. This is, therefore, a review of the studies on the utilization of canola protein in human food, comprising the extraction processes for protein isolates and fractions, the molecular character of the extracted proteins, as well as their food functional properties. A majority of studies were based on proteins extracted from the meal using alkaline solution, presumably due to its high nitrogen yield, followed by those utilizing salt extraction combined with ultrafiltration. Characteristics of canola and its predecessor rapeseed protein fractions such as nitrogen yield, molecular weight profile, isoelectric point, solubility, and thermal properties have been reported and were found to be largely related to the extraction methods. However, very little research has been carried out on the hydrophobicity and structure profiles of the protein extracts that are highly relevant to a proper understanding of food functional properties. Alkaline extracts were generally not very suitable as functional ingredients and contradictory results about many of the measured properties of canola proteins, especially their emulsification tendencies, have also been documented. Further research into improved extraction methods is recommended, as is a more systematic approach to the measurement of desired food functional properties for valid comparison between studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tang, C.-H., Wang, X.-S., & Yang, X.-Q. (2009) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.11.049 · Cited by 247
Pilot Scale Recovery of Proteins from a Pea Whey Discharge by Ultrafiltration
Gao, L. (., Nguyen, K. D., & Utioh, A. C. (2001) · LWT - Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1006/fstl.2000.0743 · Cited by 22
Cited by
The future supply of animal-derived protein for human consumption
Boland, M. J., Rae, A. N., Vereijken, J. M., Meuwissen, M. P. M., Fischer, A. R. H., van Boekel, M. A. J. S., Rutherfurd, S. M., Gruppen, H., Moughan, P. J., & Hendriks, W. H. (2013) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2012.07.002 · Cited by 524
Yang, C., Wang, Y., Vasanthan, T., & Chen, L. (2014) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.03.011 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, S. H., Mailer, R. J., Blanchard, C. L., & Agboola, S. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Food Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- R16-28
- ISSN
- 0022-1147 (ISSN-L)
- 1750-3841
- OpenAlex
- W1967735171
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.