Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,163

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics

Open access
Gibbs, Alison L., Su, Francis Edward·2002·International Statistical Review

Abstract

Summary: When studying convergence of measures, an important issue is the choice of probability metric. We provide a summary and some new results concerning bounds among some important probability metrics/distances that are used by statisticians and probabilists. Knowledge of other metrics can provide a means of deriving bounds for another one in an applied problem. Considering other metrics can also provide alternate insights. We also give examples that show that rates of convergence can strongly depend on the metric chosen. Careful consideration is necessary when choosing a metric.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00178.x

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Cited by

See all 1,163

Metadata

Authors
Gibbs, A. L., & Su, F. E.
Venue
International Statistical Review
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12
Volume
70
Issue
3
Pages
419-435
ISSN
  • 0306-7734 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-5823
OpenAlex
W2032916024
Cited by
1,163
References
49
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00178.x
The paper
Gibbs, A. L., & Su, F. E. (2002). On Choosing and Bounding Probability Metrics. International Statistical Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00178.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.