Cited by 20School Health and Nursing EducationMental Health Treatment and AccessSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

MAKINGtheLINK: a school-based health promotion programme to increase help-seeking for cannabis and mental health issues among adolescents: MAKINGtheLINK help-seeking programme

Berridge, Bonita J., Hall, Kate, Dillon, Paul, Hides, Leanne, Lubman, Dan I.·2011·Early Intervention in Psychiatry

Abstract

AIM: There is increasing concern regarding the use of cannabis among adolescents, especially given recent evidence highlighting its link with later mental disorders. Encouraging young people with mental health or drug issues to seek professional help is an important early intervention strategy; however, adolescents are typically reluctant to do so and instead turn to their peers for help. Peers may not have the skills or knowledge required to assist their friends to access professional help. This paper describes the development and evaluation of MAKINGtheLINK, a school-based health promotion programme that promotes help-seeking behaviour for mental health and cannabis use issues among young people. METHODS: The MAKINGtheLINK programme was piloted with 182 Year 10 students at a secondary school in Melbourne, Australia. Forty teachers received the MAKINGtheLINK staff professional development session. RESULTS: The delivery of the MAKINGtheLINK programme was found to be both acceptable and feasible within a school setting. Students and teachers described it as a fun, engaging, helpful and important programme. Students reported increased confidence and awareness of how to seek help for themselves or a friend, and teachers indicated increased confidence and awareness of how to assist students to seek help for cannabis use and/or mental health problems. CONCLUSIONS: MAKINGtheLINK was successfully implemented within the school curriculum. We believe this is the first school-based programme that specifically focuses on facilitating professional help-seeking for cannabis use and mental health problems among young people, and demonstrates that utilizing peer models for help-seeking is a valuable resource for early intervention initiatives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2010.00252.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berridge, B. J., Hall, K., Dillon, P., Hides, L., & Lubman, D. I.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Lubman, Dan I.
Venue
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-27
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
81-88
ISSN
1751-7885 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1906003018
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
school health promotion, help-seeking, cannabis use, adolescent mental health, peer support, early intervention, teacher professional development, high school students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Mental Disorders, Marijuana Abuse, Female, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Peer Group, School Health Services, Program Evaluation, Program Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review