Cited by 221Emotions and Moral BehaviorHistory of Emotions ResearchFamily Dynamics and Relationships

Mothering, Guilt and Shame

Sutherland, Jean‐Anne·2010·Sociology Compass

Abstract

Abstract Even as research continues to explore mothering experiences and social psychologists consider the costs of guilt and shame, few empirical works have examined the relationships among mothering, guilt and shame. The idea that guilt and shame are necessary components of mothering is widespread. A few sources take seriously the emotions of guilt and shame nor has considerable thought been given to the social nature of guilt and shame. Rather than accept a purely psychological explanation of guilt and shame, I investigate the institutional and interactional dynamics that fuel women’s drives to perform as ‘the good mother’. In particular, I explore the ‘good mothering’ ideology that places mothers at risk of guilt and shame and then two social and institutional spaces where guilt and shame are likely to be prevalent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-9020.2010.00283.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The relationship between dog owners' guilt and discrepancy between actual and ideal self, in regard to the role of a dog owner, mirrored human-only family research.

    “Additionally, our results pertaining to the relationship between pet owners’ guilt and discrepancy between participants’ actual and ideal self, in regard to the role of a dog owner, also mirrored human-only family research.”

    From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

  • WFC and related guilt appear to be more prevalent among women than men.

    “several studies suggest that WFC and related guilt appear to be more prevalent among women (both working and stay-at-home mothers), when compared to men [8,30,31,32,33,34,35].”

    From Disenfranchised Guilt-Pet Owners' Burden. (2022) · cites this paper as [34]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sutherland, J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
Corresponding author
Sutherland, Jean‐Anne
Venue
Sociology Compass
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-05
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
310-321
ISSN
1751-9020 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2160442321
Cited by
221
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sociology Compass (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Emotions Research
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
Keywords
maternal care, guilt, shame, women, social construction of emotion, institutional dynamics, interaction dynamics, maternal identity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review