Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 647

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Routine Analyses of Trace Elements in Geological Samples using Flow Injection and Low Pressure On‐Line Liquid Chromatography Coupled to ICP‐MS: A Study of Geochemical Reference Materials BR, DR‐N, UB‐N, AN‐G and GH

Open access
Carignan, Jean, Hild, Pascal, Mevelle, Guy, Morel, Jacques, Yeghicheyan, Delphine·2001·Geostandards Newsletter

Abstract

We describe analytical procedures for trace element determinations developed at the CNRS Service d'Analyse des Roches et des Minéraux (SARM) and report results obtained for five geochemical reference materials: basalt BR, diorite DR‐N, serpentinite UB‐N, anorthosite AN‐G and granite GH. Results for rare earth elements, U and Th are also reported for other reference materials including dunite DTS‐1, peridotite PCC‐1 and basalt BIR‐1. All rocks were decomposed using alkali fusion. Analyses were done by flow injection ICP‐MS and by on‐line low pressure liquid chromatography (LC)‐ICP‐MS for samples containing very low REE, U and Th concentrations. This latter method yielded limits of determination much lower than data by direct introduction and eliminated possible isobaric interference on these elements. Although results agree with most of the working values, when available, results for some elements differed slightly from the recommended concentrations. In these cases, we propose new values for Co, Y and Zn in basalt BR, Zr in diorite DR‐N, Sr and U in granite GH, and Ga and Y in anorthosite AN‐G. Furthermore, although the Sb concentration measured in AN‐G was very close to our limit of determination, our value (0.3 ± 0.1 μg g−1) is much lower than the reported working value of 1.4 ± 0.2 μg g−1. These new values would need to be confirmed by a new inter‐laboratory programme to further characterise these reference materials. Results obtained for REE, Th and U concentrations using the on‐line low pressure LC‐ICP‐MS yielded good limits of determination (ng g−1 to sub‐ng g−1 for rocks and ng l−1 to sub‐ng l−1 for natural waters) and accurate results. The efficiency of the matrix separation allowed accurate measurements of Eu without the need to correct the BaO isobaric interference for samples having Ba/Eu ratios as high as 27700. For REE concentrations in PCC‐1 and DTS‐1, differences with values reported in the literature are interpreted as resulting from possible heterogeneity of the reference materials. Thorium and U values are proposed for these two samples, as well as for AN‐G and UB‐N.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2001.tb00595.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 647

Metadata

Authors
Carignan, J., Hild, P., Mevelle, G., Morel, J., & Yeghicheyan, D.
Venue
Geostandards Newsletter
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-12
Volume
25
Issue
2-3
Pages
187-198
ISSN
0150-5505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969414340
Cited by
647
References
0
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Routine Analyses of Trace Elements in Geological Samples using Flow Injection and Low Pressure On‐Line Liquid Chromatography Coupled to ICP‐MS: A Study of Geochemical Reference Materials BR, DR‐N, UB‐N, AN‐G and GH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2001.tb00595.x
The paper
Carignan, J., Hild, P., Mevelle, G., Morel, J., & Yeghicheyan, D. (2001). Routine Analyses of Trace Elements in Geological Samples using Flow Injection and Low Pressure On‐Line Liquid Chromatography Coupled to ICP‐MS: A Study of Geochemical Reference Materials BR, DR‐N, UB‐N, AN‐G and GH. Geostandards Newsletter. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2001.tb00595.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.