The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accurate U‐Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry
Abstract
Various zircons of Proterozoic to Oligocene ages (1060‐31 Ma) were analysed by laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry. Calibration was performed using Harvard reference zircon 91500 or Australian National University reference zircon TEMORA 1 as external calibrant. The results agree with those obtained by SIMS within 2s error. Twenty‐four trace and rare earth elements (P, Ti, Cr, Y, Nb, fourteen REE, Hf, Ta, Pb, Th and U) were analysed on four fragments of zircon 91500. NIST SRM 610 was used as the reference material and 29 Si was used as internal calibrant. Based on determinations of four fragments, this zircon shows significant intra‐and inter‐fragment variations in the range from 10% to 85% on a scale of 120 μm, with the variation of REE concentrations up to 38.7%, although the chondrite‐normalised REE distributions are very similar. In contrast, the determined age values for zircon 91500 agree with TIMS data and are homogeneous within 8.7 Ma (2 s). A two‐stage ablation strategy was developed for optimising U‐Pb age determinations with satisfactory trace element and REE results. The first cycle of ablation was used to collect data for age determination only, which was followed by continuous ablation on the same spot to determine REE and trace element concentrations. Based on this procedure, it was possible to measure zircon ages as low as 30.37 0.39 Ma (MSWD = 1.4; 2 s). Other examples for older zircons are also given.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Recycling lower continental crust in the North China craton
Gao, S., Rudnick, R. L., Yuan, H.-L., Liu, X.-M., Liu, Y.-S., Xu, W.-L., Ling, W.-L., Ayers, J., Wang, X.-C., & Wang, Q.-H. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03162 · Cited by 1,802
Self-citationGao, S., Yang, J., Zhou, L., Li, M., Hu, Z., Guo, J., Yuan, H., Gong, H., Xiao, G., & Wei, J. (2011) · American Journal of Science · doi:10.2475/02.2011.03 · Cited by 486
Self-citationThe Hulan Group: Its role in the evolution of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt of NE China
Wu, F.-Y., Zhao, G.-C., Sun, D.-Y., Wilde, S. A., & Yang, J.-H. (2007) · Journal of Asian Earth Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jseaes.2007.01.003 · Cited by 462
Self-citationZhang, S.-H., Zhao, Y., Davis, G. A., Ye, H., & Wu, F. (2014) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.12.004 · Cited by 451
Self-citationZhang, S.-B., Zheng, Y.-F., Wu, Y.-B., Zhao, Z.-F., Gao, S., & Wu, F.-Y. (2006) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.027 · Cited by 393
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yuan, H., Gao, S., Liu, X., Li, H., Günther, D., & Wu, F.
- Venue
- Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 353-370
- ISSN
- 0150-5505 (ISSN-L)
- 1639-4488
- 1751-908X
- OpenAlex
- W1980640006
- Cited by
- 1,431
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accurate U‐Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb00755.x
- The paper
- Yuan, H., Gao, S., Liu, X., Li, H., Günther, D., & Wu, F. (2004). Accurate U‐Pb Age and Trace Element Determinations of Zircon by Laser Ablation‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry. Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-908x.2004.tb00755.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.