Cited by 67Attachment and Relationship DynamicsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsChild Development and Digital Technology

Technology, Relationships, and Problems: A Research Synthesis

Hertlein, Katherine M., Webster, Megan·2008·Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Abstract

The advances in technology alter the ways we interact with each other. For some, the use of technology can facilitate a relationship; for others, technology can complicate aspects of a relationship. The purpose of this research synthesis is to summarize current research exploring the ways in which technology impacts relationships negatively. Eight studies were reviewed across the following areas: preoperational definitions, sample, methodology, control of extraneous variables, causal influence, generalizability, validity of statistical findings, and conclusions. Implications for authors, researchers, and therapists working with couples and families struggling with technology issues are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00087.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Up to two-thirds of those who go online for sexual purposes engage in offline sexual intercourse with their online partner.

    “Up to 30% of internet users go online for sexual purposes, and up to two-thirds of them engage in offline sexual intercourse with their online partner [86].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [86]

  • Up to 30% of internet users go online for sexual purposes.

    “Up to 30% of internet users go online for sexual purposes, and up to two-thirds of them engage in offline sexual intercourse with their online partner [86].”

    From Love and Infidelity: Causes and Consequences (2023) · cites this paper as [86]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hertlein, K. M., & Webster, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
  • University of Nevada, Reno (US)
Corresponding author
Hertlein, Katherine M.
Venue
Journal of Marital and Family Therapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-10
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
445-460
ISSN
  • 0194-472X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-0606
OpenAlex
W2133245180
Cited by
67
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
interpersonal relationships, couples, family relationships, negative effects of technology, relationship problems, digital technology use
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Life Style, Male, Professional-Patient Relations, Research Design, Sexual Behavior, United States, Evidence-Based Medicine, Couples Therapy, Internet, Empirical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review