Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

COMPARISON OF BANK EROSION AT VEGETATED AND NON‐VEGETATED CHANNEL BENDS1

Beeson, C.E., Doyle, P. F.·1995·JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Following major floods in 1990 which resulted in widespread bank erosion in southern British Columbia, four streams typical of the region were evaluated for the effect which riparian vegetation played in reducing erosion. A total of 748 bends in the four stream reaches were assessed by comparing pre‐ and post‐flood aerial photography. Bends without riparian vegetation were found to be nearly five times as likely as vegetated bends to have undergone detectable erosion during the flood events. Major bank erosion was 30 times more prevalent on non‐vegetated bends as on vegetated bends. The likelihood of erosion on semi‐vegetated bends was between that of the vegetated and non‐vegetated categories of bends.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03414.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Beeson, C. E., & Doyle, P. F.
Venue
JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1995-12
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
983-990
ISSN
  • 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1688
OpenAlex
W2017117918
Cited by
213
References
0
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: COMPARISON OF BANK EROSION AT VEGETATED AND NON‐VEGETATED CHANNEL BENDS1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03414.x
The paper
Beeson, C. E., & Doyle, P. F. (1995). COMPARISON OF BANK EROSION AT VEGETATED AND NON‐VEGETATED CHANNEL BENDS1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1995.tb03414.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.