The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulation of Combined Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development for Sustainable Stormwater Management1
Abstract
Damodaram, Chandana, Marcio H. Giacomoni, C. Prakash Khedun, Hillary Holmes, Andrea Ryan, William Saour, and Emily M. Zechman, 2010. Simulation of Combined Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development for Sustainable Stormwater Management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association (JAWRA) 1‐12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752‐1688.2010.00462.x Abstract: Urbanization causes increased stormwater runoff volumes, leading to erosion, flooding, and the degradation of instream ecosystem health. Although Best Management Practices (BMPs) are used widely as a means for controlling flood runoff events, Low Impact Development (LID) options have been proposed as an alternative approach to better mimic the natural flow regime by using decentralized designs to control stormwater runoff at the source, rather than at a centralized location in the watershed. For highly urbanized areas, LID practices such as rainwater harvesting, green roofs, and permeable pavements can be used to retrofit existing infrastructure and reduce runoff volumes and peak flows. This paper describes a modeling approach to incorporate these LID practices in an existing hydrologic model to estimate the effects of LID choices on streamflow. The modeling approach has been applied to a watershed located on the campus of Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas, to predict the stormwater reductions resulting from retrofitting existing infrastructure with LID technologies. Results demonstrate that use of these LID practices yield significant stormwater control for small events and less control for flood events. A combined BMP‐LID approach is tested for runoff control for both flood and frequent rainfall events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Performance and implementation of low impact development – A review
Eckart, K., McPhee, Z., & Bolisetti, T. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.254 · Cited by 700
The effects of low impact development on urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics
Qin, H.-P., Li, Z.-X., & Fu, G. (2013) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.08.026 · Cited by 552
Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Di Sabatino, S., Leo, L. S., Capobianco, V., Oen, A. M. P., McClain, M. E., & Lopez-Gunn, E. (2020) · Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences · doi:10.5194/nhess-20-243-2020 · Cited by 428
Hydrologic modeling of Low Impact Development systems at the urban catchment scale
Palla, A., & Gnecco, I. (2015) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.050 · Cited by 401
Modeling flood reduction effects of low impact development at a watershed scale
Ahiablame, L., & Shakya, R. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.01.036 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Damodaram, C., Giacomoni, M. H., Prakash Khedun, C., Holmes, H., Ryan, A., Saour, W., & Zechman, E. M.
- Venue
- JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-26
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 907-918
- ISSN
- 1093-474X (ISSN-L)
- 1752-1688
- OpenAlex
- W1572636535
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulation of Combined Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development for Sustainable Stormwater Management1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00462.x
- The paper
- Damodaram, C., Giacomoni, M. H., Prakash Khedun, C., Holmes, H., Ryan, A., Saour, W., & Zechman, E. M. (2010). Simulation of Combined Best Management Practices and Low Impact Development for Sustainable Stormwater Management1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00462.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.