Cited by 916Genetic diversity and population structureWildlife Ecology and ConservationFish Ecology and Management Studies

Assessing the benefits and risks of translocations in changing environments: a genetic perspective

Open access
Weeks, Andrew R., Sgro, Carla M., Young, Andrew G., Frankham, Richard, Mitchell, Nicki J., Miller, Kim A., Byrne, Margaret, Coates, David J. +5 more·2011·Evolutionary Applications

Abstract

Translocations are being increasingly proposed as a way of conserving biodiversity, particularly in the management of threatened and keystone species, with the aims of maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function under the combined pressures of habitat fragmentation and climate change. Evolutionary genetic considerations should be an important part of translocation strategies, but there is often confusion about concepts and goals. Here, we provide a classification of translocations based on specific genetic goals for both threatened species and ecological restoration, separating targets based on ‘genetic rescue’ of current population fitness from those focused on maintaining adaptive potential. We then provide a framework for assessing the genetic benefits and risks associated with translocations and provide guidelines for managers focused on conserving biodiversity and evolutionary processes. Case studies are developed to illustrate the framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00192.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introducing SVs into small populations may carry evolutionary risks, particularly if they alter regulatory architecture.

    “However, introducing SVs into small populations may carry evolutionary risks, particularly if they alter regulatory architecture, which underscores the importance of weighing potential benefits against the disruption of locally adapted genomic configurations (198).”

    From Topological Approaches in Animal Comparative Genomics (2026) · cites this paper as [198]

    The “Weighing the risks” section says translocations can cause outbreeding depression, particularly when populations have fixed chromosomal differences or are adapted to different environments. The Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides case study also warns that mixing chromosome races could harm fitness in small populations. Our copy does not attribute that risk specifically to introduced structural variants altering regulatory architecture. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 76

  1. Armstrong DP Seddon P Directions in reintroduction biology Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2008 23 20 25 18160175
  2. Arnold ML Martin N Hybrid fitness across time and habitats Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2010 25 530 536 20598770
  3. Atkins KE Travis JM Local adaptation and the evolution of species’ ranges under climate change Journal of Theoretical Biology 2010 266 449 457 20654630
  4. Bailey J Hendry A Kinnison M Post D Palkovacs E Pelletier F Harmon L From genes to ecosystems: an emerging synthesis of eco-evolutionary dynamics New Phytologist 2009 184 743 745 20021593
  5. Boissin E Hoareau TB Berrebi P Effects of current and historic habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure of the sand goby Pomatoschistus minutus (Osteichthys, Gobiidae) Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2010 102 175 198
  6. Bradshaw WE Holzapfel CM Genetic response to rapid climate change: it's seasonal timing that matters Molecular Ecology 2008 17 157 166 17850269
  7. Broadhurst LM Lowe A Coates DJ Cunningham SA McDonald M Vesk PA Yates C Seed supply for broadscale restoration: maximising evolutionary potential Evolutionary Applications 2008 1 587 597 PMC3352390 25567799
  8. Brownlie H Playford J Wallace H Shapcott A Population ecology and genetics of the vulnerable Acacia attenuata (Mimosaceae) and their significance for its conservation, recovery and translocation Australian Journal of Botany 2009 57 675 687
  9. Byers DL Waller DM Do plant populations purge their genetic load? Effects of population size and mating history on inbreeding depression Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1999 30 479 513
  10. Byrne M Elliott CP Yates C Coates DJ Extensive pollen dispersal in a bird-pollinated shrub, Calothamnus quadrifidus, in a fragmented landscape Molecular Ecology 2007 16 1303 1314 17391415
  11. Carney S Gardner K Rieseberg L Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus) Evolution 2000 54 462 474 10937223
  12. Croxall JP Trathan PN Murphy EJ Environmental change and Antarctic seabird populations Science 2002 297 1510 1514 12202819
  13. Cudmore TJ Bjorklund N Carroll AL Lindgren BS Climate change and range expansion of an aggressive bark beetle: evidence of higher beetle reproduction in naive host tree populations Journal of Applied Ecology 2010 47 1036 1043
  14. Damschen E Haddad N Orrock J Tewksbury J Levey D Corridors increase plant species richness at large scales Science 2006 313 1284 1286 16946070
  15. Edmands S Between a rock and a hard place: evaluating the relative risks of inbreeding and outbreeding for conservation and management Molecular Ecology 2007 16 463 475 17257106
  16. Edmands S Feaman HV Harrison JS Timmerman CC Genetic consequences of many generations of hybridization between divergent copepod populations Journal of Heredity 2005 96 114 123 15618307
  17. Erickson D Fenster C Intraspecific hybridization and the recovery of fitness in the native legume Chamaecrista fasciculata Evolution 2006 60 225 233 16610315
  18. Field D Young A Whelan R Ayre D Relative frequency of sympatric species influences interspecific hybrid production, seed production and seedling performance in the uncommon Eucalyptus aggregata Journal of Ecology 2008 96 1198 1210
  19. Frankel O Genetic conservation: our evolutionary responsibility Genetics 1974 78 53 17248668 PMC1213213
  20. Frankel OH Soule ME Conservation and Evolution 1981 Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
  21. Frankham R Ballou JD Eldridge MDB Lacy RC Ralls K Dudash MR Fenster CB Predicting the probability of outbreeding depression Conservation Biology 2011 25 465 475 21486369
  22. Gaston KJ Valuing common species Science 2010 327 154 155 20056880
  23. Germano J Bishop P Suitability of amphibians and reptiles for translocation Conservation Biology 2009 23 7 15 19143783
  24. Gingerich PD Rate of evolution Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2009 40 657 675
  25. Grant PR Grant BR Conspecific versus heterospecific gene exchange between populations of Darwin's finches Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 2010 365 1065 1076 PMC2830231 20194169
  26. Griffith B Scott J Carpenter J Reed C Translocation as a species conservation tool: status and strategy Science 1989 245 477 480 17750257
  27. Hedrick PW Gene flow and genetic restoration: the Florida panther as a case study Conservation Biology 1995 5 996 1007 34261240
  28. Hendry AP Farrugia TJ Kinnison MT Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations Molecular Ecology 2008 17 20 29 18173498
  29. Hereford J A quantiative survey of local adaptation and fitness trade-offs American Naturalist 2009 173 579 588 19272016
  30. Hoegh-Guldberg O Hughes L McIntyre S Lindenmayer DB Parmesan C Possingham HP Thomas CD Assisted colonization and rapid climate change Science 2008 321 345 346 18635780
  31. Hoffmann AA Willi Y Detecting genetic responses to environmental change Nature Reviews Genetics 2008 9 421 432 18463665
  32. Hohenlohe PA Bassham S Etter PD Stiffler N Johnson EA Cresko WA Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags PLOS Genetics 2010 6 e10000862 PMC2829049 20195501
  33. Holmes GD James EA Hoffmann A Limitations to reproductive output and genetic rescue in populations of the rare shrub Grevillea repens (Proteaceae) Annals of Botany 2008 102 1031 1041 18922849 PMC2712411
  34. Hunter ML Climate change and moving species: Furthering the debate on assisted colonization Conservation Biology 2007 21 1356 1358 17883502
  35. Jamieson I Wallis G Briske J Inbreeding and endangered species management: is New Zealand out of step with the rest of the world? Conservation Biology 2006 20 38 47 16909657
  36. Keller M Kollman J Edwards P Genetic introgression from distant provenances reduces fitness in local weed populations Journal of Applied Ecology 2000 37 647 659
  37. Lopez S Rousset F Shaw F Shaw R Ronce O Joint effects of inbreeding and local adaptation on the evolution of genetic load after fragmentation Conservation Biology 2009 23 1618 1627 19775278
  38. Mayr E Animal Species and Evolution 1963 Harvard Belknap Press
  39. McKay J Christian C Harrison S Rice K “How local is local?”– a review of practical and conceptual issues in the genetics of restoration Restoration Ecology 2005 13 432 440
  40. McLachlan JS Hellmann JJ Schwartz MW A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change Conservation Biology 2007 21 297 302 17391179
  41. Menges ES Restoration demography and genetics of plants: when is a translocation successful? Australian Journal of Botany 2008 56 187 196
  42. Mitrovski P Heinze DA Broome L Hoffmann AA Weeks AR High levels of variation despite genetic fragmentation in populations of the endangered mountain pygmy-possum, Burramys parvus, in alpine Australia Molecular Ecology 2007 16 75 87 17181722
  43. Mitrovski P Hoffmann AA Heinze DA Weeks AR Rapid loss of genetic variation in an endangered possum Biology Letters 2008 4 134 138 17956839 PMC2413263
  44. Morgan JW Ecological studies of the endangered Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides I. Seed production, soil seed bank dynamics, population density and their effect on recruitment Australian Journal of Botany 1995 43 1 11
  45. Mueller JM Hellmann JJ An assessment of invasion risk from assisted migration Conservation Biology 2008 22 562 567 18577085
  46. Murray BG Young AG High cytogenetic variation in the endangered daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides Annals of Botany 2001 87 83 90
  47. Nadeau NJ Jiggins CD A golden age for evolutionary genetics? Genomic studies of adaptation in natural populations Trends in Genetics 2010 26 484 492 20851493
  48. Narum SR Campbell NR Kozkay CC Meyer KA Adaptation of redband trout in desert and montane environments Molecular Ecology 2010 19 4622 4637 20880387
  49. O'Brien E Mazanec R Krauss S Provenance variation of ecologically important traits of forest trees: implications for restoration Journal of Applied Ecology 2007 44 583 593
  50. Palmer M Filoso S Restoration of ecosystem services for environmental markets Science 2009 325 575 576 19644112
  51. Pavlik B Falk D Millar C Olwell M Defining and measuring success Restoring Diversity: Strategies for the Reintroduction of Endangered Plants 1996 Washington Island Press 127 155
  52. Peer K Taborsky M Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating Evolution 2005 59 317 323 15807418
  53. Pickup M Young AG Population size, self-incompatibility and genetic rescue in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides Heredity 2008 100 268 274 17940547
  54. Potts B Turner Review No. 6 Genetic pollution of native eucalypt gene pools-identifying the risks Australian Journal of Botany 2003 51 1
  55. Reusch T Wood T Molecular ecology of global change Molecular ecology 2007 16 3973 3992 17894755
  56. Reusch TB Ehlers A Hammerli A Worm B Ecosystem recovery after climatic extremes enhanced by genotypic diversity Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2005 102 2826 2831 PMC549506 15710890
  57. Ricciardi A Simberloff D Assisted colonization is not a viable conservation strategy Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009 24 248 253 19324453
  58. Richardson DM Hellmann JJ McLachlan JS Sax DF Schwartz MW Gonzalez P Brennan EJ Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2009 106 9721 9724 PMC2694035 19509337
  59. Rieseberg LH Raymond O Rosenthal DM Lai Z Livingstone K Nakazato T Durphy JL Major ecological transitions in wild sunflowers facilitated by hybridization Science 2003 301 1211 1216 12907807
  60. Saltonstall K Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2002 99 2445 2449 PMC122384 11854535
  61. Seehausen O Hybridization and adaptive radiation Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2004 19 198 207 16701254
  62. Sgrò CM Lowe AJ Hoffmann AA Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change Evolutionary Applications 2011 4 326 337 PMC3352557 25567976
  63. Spielman D Brook BW Frankham R Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2004 101 15261 15264 PMC524053 15477597
  64. Stelkens RB Schmid C Selz O Seehausen O Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish BMC Evolutionary Biology 2009 9 283 19961584 PMC2796671
  65. Umina PA Weeks AR Kearney MR McKechnie SW Hoffmann AA A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change Science 2005 308 691 693 15860627
  66. Vila C Sundqvist AK Flagstad O Seddon J Bjornerfeldt S Kojola I Casulli A Rescue of a severely bottlenecked wolf (Canis lupus) population by a single immigrant Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2003 270 91 97 PMC1691214 12590776
  67. Walther GR Roques A Hulme PE Sykes MT Pysek P Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2009 24 686 693 19712994
  68. Westemeier RL Brawn JD Simpson SA Esker TL Jansen RW Walk JW Kershner EL Tracking the long-term decline and recovery of an isolated population Science 1998 282 1695 1698 9831558
  69. Willi Y van Buskirk J Hoffmann AA Limits to the adaptive potential of small populations Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2006 37 433 478
  70. Winnard AL Coulson G Sixteen years of Eastern Barred Bandicoot Perameles gunnii reintroductions in Victoria: a review Pacific Conservation Biology 2008 14 34 53
  71. Wuethrich B Biodiversity: reconstructing Brazil's atlantic rainforest Science 2007 315 1070 1072 17322040
  72. Young AG Murray BG Genetic bottlenecks and dysgenic gene flow in re-established populations of the endangered grassland daisy Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides Australian Journal of Botany 2000 48 409 416
  73. Young AG Pickup M Low S allele numbers limit mate availability, reduce seed set and skew fitness in small populations of a self-incompatible plant Journal of Applied Ecology 2010 47 541 548
  74. Young A Miller C Gregory E Langston A Sporophytic self-incompatibility in diploid and tetraploid races of Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides (Asteraceae) Australian Journal of Botany 2000a 48 667 672
  75. Young AG Brown AHD Murray BG Thrall PH Miller C Young AG Clarke GM Genetic erosion, restricted mating and reduced viability in fragmented populations of the endangered grassland herb: Rutidosis leptorrhynchoides Genetics, Demography and Viability of Fragmented Populations 2000b Cambridge Cambridge University Press 335 359
  76. Zayed A Packer L Complementary sex determination substantially increases extinction proneness of haplodiploid populations Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 2005 102 10742 10746 PMC1180771 16020532

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weeks, A. R., Sgro, C. M., Young, A. G., Frankham, R., Mitchell, N. J., Miller, K. A., Byrne, M., Coates, D. J., Eldridge, M. D. B., Sunnucks, P., Breed, M. F., James, E. A., & Hoffmann, A. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Macquarie University (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Australian Museum (AU)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
Corresponding author
Weeks, Andrew R.
Venue
Evolutionary Applications
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-18
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
709-725
ISSN
  • 1752-4563 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-4571
OpenAlex
W2142398490
Cited by
916
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 51 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 80 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 85 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 22
FWCI
24.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evolutionary Applications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
translocation, genetic rescue, adaptive potential, threatened species, ecological restoration, climate change, habitat fragmentation, conservation genetics, population fitness, biodiversity conservation, evolutionary processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review