Cited by 72Fermentation and Sensory AnalysisHorticultural and Viticultural ResearchBiochemical and biochemical processes

The effect of Saccharomyces bayanus-mediated fermentation on the chemical composition and aroma profile of Chardonnay wine

EGLINTON, JEFFREY M., McWILLIAM, SCOTT J., FOGARTY, MICHAEL W., FRANCIS, I. LEIGH, KWIATKOWSKI, MARIOLA J., HØJ, PETER B., HENSCHKE, PAUL A.·2000·Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Abstract

The use of yeasts other than Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce wines with novel aroma and flavour profiles is gaining increased attention. The present study is concerned with the sensory impact on wine of fermentation with two selected Saccharomyces bayanus strains. The S. bayanus strains AWRI 1176 and AWRI 1375 were compared to S. cerevisiae strain AWRI 838 for their ability to affect the aroma profile and chemical composition of Chardonnay wine. Wines that were made with the S. bayanus strains contained more glycerol, succinic acid, acetaldehyde and SO2 than reference wines made with the S. cerevisiae wine yeast, but less acetic acid, malic acid and ethyl acetate. There were significant differences in the aroma profile of wines made with each yeast, as quantified by formal sensory descriptive analysis. Wines made with S. cerevisiae AWRI 838 were rated highly in the attributes ‘estery’, ‘pineapple’, ‘peach’ and ‘citrus’. Wines made with S. bayanus AWRI 1176 were rated lower than AWRI 838 in each of these attributes, but higher in the attributes ‘cooked orange peel’, ‘yeasty’, ‘nutty’ and ‘aldehyde’. The aroma profile of wine made using AWRI 1375 was different from that of wine made with the other yeasts, showing intermediate scores for the ‘estery’, ‘citrus’, ‘nutty’ and ‘aldehyde’ attributes, and no significant difference from the AWRI 838 strain in the attributes ‘pineapple’ and ‘peach’. These results demonstrate that, in addition to producing wine which has a different chemical composition, S. bayanus strains can produce a different sensory profile in wine when compared to a widely used S. cerevisiae wine yeast.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00178.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strains of Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces uvarum typically produce less acetic acid than Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

    “Strains of the related cryotolerant species, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces uvarum, typically produce less acetic acid than Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Giudici et al. 1995, Eglinton et al. 2000).”

    From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Eglinton et al. 2000

  • Succinic acid production is highly variable amongst strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but Saccharomyces uvarum or Saccharomyces bayanus strains tend to produce higher concentrations.

    “Its production is highly variable amongst strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae but Saccharomyces uvarum or Saccharomyces bayanus strains tend to produce higher concentrations (Heerde and Radler 1978, Giudici et al. 1995, Eglinton et al. 2000).”

    From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Eglinton et al. 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
EGLINTON, J. M., McWILLIAM, S. J., FOGARTY, M. W., FRANCIS, I. L., KWIATKOWSKI, M. J., HØJ, P. B., & HENSCHKE, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Australian Wine Research Institute (AU)
  • Adelaide University (AU)
Corresponding author
EGLINTON, JEFFREY M.
Venue
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
Published
2000-10
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
190-196
ISSN
  • 1322-7130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-0238
OpenAlex
W2003632126
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research (publishedVersion)
Funders
Alberta Water Research Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Biochemical and biochemical processes
Keywords
Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chardonnay wine, wine aroma profile, wine composition, descriptive sensory analysis, glycerol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, yeast strain comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review