The effect of Saccharomyces bayanus-mediated fermentation on the chemical composition and aroma profile of Chardonnay wine
Abstract
The use of yeasts other than Saccharomyces cerevisiae to produce wines with novel aroma and flavour profiles is gaining increased attention. The present study is concerned with the sensory impact on wine of fermentation with two selected Saccharomyces bayanus strains. The S. bayanus strains AWRI 1176 and AWRI 1375 were compared to S. cerevisiae strain AWRI 838 for their ability to affect the aroma profile and chemical composition of Chardonnay wine. Wines that were made with the S. bayanus strains contained more glycerol, succinic acid, acetaldehyde and SO2 than reference wines made with the S. cerevisiae wine yeast, but less acetic acid, malic acid and ethyl acetate. There were significant differences in the aroma profile of wines made with each yeast, as quantified by formal sensory descriptive analysis. Wines made with S. cerevisiae AWRI 838 were rated highly in the attributes ‘estery’, ‘pineapple’, ‘peach’ and ‘citrus’. Wines made with S. bayanus AWRI 1176 were rated lower than AWRI 838 in each of these attributes, but higher in the attributes ‘cooked orange peel’, ‘yeasty’, ‘nutty’ and ‘aldehyde’. The aroma profile of wine made using AWRI 1375 was different from that of wine made with the other yeasts, showing intermediate scores for the ‘estery’, ‘citrus’, ‘nutty’ and ‘aldehyde’ attributes, and no significant difference from the AWRI 838 strain in the attributes ‘pineapple’ and ‘peach’. These results demonstrate that, in addition to producing wine which has a different chemical composition, S. bayanus strains can produce a different sensory profile in wine when compared to a widely used S. cerevisiae wine yeast.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Strains of Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces uvarum typically produce less acetic acid than Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
“Strains of the related cryotolerant species, Saccharomyces bayanus and Saccharomyces uvarum, typically produce less acetic acid than Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Giudici et al. 1995, Eglinton et al. 2000).”
From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Eglinton et al. 2000
Succinic acid production is highly variable amongst strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, but Saccharomyces uvarum or Saccharomyces bayanus strains tend to produce higher concentrations.
“Its production is highly variable amongst strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae but Saccharomyces uvarum or Saccharomyces bayanus strains tend to produce higher concentrations (Heerde and Radler 1978, Giudici et al. 1995, Eglinton et al. 2000).”
From Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour (2005) · cites this paper as Eglinton et al. 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour
SWIEGERS, J. H., BARTOWSKY, E. J., HENSCHKE, P. A., & PRETORIUS, I. S. (2005) · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research · doi:10.1111/j.1755-0238.2005.tb00285.x · Cited by 1,216 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- EGLINTON, J. M., McWILLIAM, S. J., FOGARTY, M. W., FRANCIS, I. L., KWIATKOWSKI, M. J., HØJ, P. B., & HENSCHKE, P. A.
- Affiliations
- Australian Wine Research Institute (AU)
- Adelaide University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- EGLINTON, JEFFREY M.
- ORCID
- FRANCIS, I. LEIGH
- Venue
- Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 190-196
- ISSN
- 1322-7130 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0238
- OpenAlex
- W2003632126
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Alberta Water Research Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Horticultural and Viticultural Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biotechnology › Biochemical and biochemical processes
- Keywords
- Saccharomyces bayanus, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Chardonnay wine, wine aroma profile, wine composition, descriptive sensory analysis, glycerol, acetic acid, ethyl acetate, yeast strain comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review