The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer
Open accessAbstract
Oomycete species occupy many different environments and many ecological niches. The genera Phytophthora and Pythium for example, contain many plant pathogens which cause enormous damage to a wide range of plant species. Proper identification to the species level is a critical first step in any investigation of oomycetes, whether it is research driven or compelled by the need for rapid and accurate diagnostics during a pathogen outbreak. The use of DNA for oomycete species identification is well established, but DNA barcoding with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) is a relatively new approach that has yet to be assessed over a significant sample of oomycete genera. In this study we have sequenced COI, from 1205 isolates representing 23 genera. A comparison to internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequences from the same isolates showed that COI identification is a practical option; complementary because it uses the mitochondrial genome instead of nuclear DNA. In some cases COI was more discriminative than ITS at the species level. This is in contrast to the large ribosomal subunit, which showed poor species resolution when sequenced from a subset of the isolates used in this study. The results described in this paper indicate that COI sequencing and the dataset generated are a valuable addition to the currently available oomycete taxonomy resources, and that both COI, the default DNA barcode supported by GenBank, and ITS, the de facto barcode accepted by the oomycete and mycology community, are acceptable and complementary DNA barcodes to be used for identification of oomycetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fungal diversity notes 111–252—taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa
Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Chethana, K. W. T., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lücking, R., et al. (2015) · Fungal Diversity · doi:10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5 · Cited by 751
Metadata
- Authors
- ROBIDEAU, G. P., De COCK, A. W. A. M., COFFEY, M. D., VOGLMAYR, H., BROUWER, H., BALA, K., CHITTY, D. W., DÉSAULNIERS, N., EGGERTSON, Q. A., GACHON, C. M. M., HU, C., KÜPPER, F. C., RINTOUL, T. L., SARHAN, E., VERSTAPPEN, E. C. P., ZHANG, Y., BONANTS, P. J. M., RISTAINO, J. B., & ANDRÉ LÉVESQUE, C.
- Venue
- Molecular Ecology Resources
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-06-20
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1002-1011
- ISSN
- 1755-098X (ISSN-L)
- 1755-0998
- OpenAlex
- W1939244766
- Cited by
- 662
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03041.x
- The paper
- ROBIDEAU, G. P., De COCK, A. W. A. M., COFFEY, M. D., VOGLMAYR, H., BROUWER, H., BALA, K., CHITTY, D. W., DÉSAULNIERS, N., EGGERTSON, Q. A., GACHON, C. M. M., HU, C., KÜPPER, F. C., RINTOUL, T. L., SARHAN, E., VERSTAPPEN, E. C. P., ZHANG, Y., BONANTS, P. J. M., RISTAINO, J. B., & ANDRÉ LÉVESQUE, C. (2011). DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. Molecular Ecology Resources. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03041.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.