Endangering the endangered: The effects of perceived rarity on species exploitation
Abstract
Classifying species by threat status can result in conservation benefits such as increased protection, but can also be an incentive to hunters responding to increased consumer demand for goods perceived to be rare, and therefore valuable. Bioeconomic theory provides a framework for examining the population consequences of differing responses of consumers (demand) and hunters (supply) to perceived rarity. We present a series of illustrative case studies of how perceived rarity affects consumer behavior and hunting pressure, and use a model to explore the scenario of most conservation concern (where rarity itself fuels increased exploitation). Rarity‐fuelled demand can have two undesirable outcomes: the species may become trapped at a low population size, or escalating hunting effort may drive the species to extinction. Understanding the response of consumers and hunters to perceived rarity is vital for predicting the impact of intervention strategies that seek to minimize extinction risk.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rareness may also result in an increased demand for certain species (e.g., pet trade), resulting in removal of individuals from the wild.
“Rareness may also result in an increased demand for certain species (e.g., pet trade), resulting in removal of individuals from the wild (Hall et al., 2008).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Hall et al., 2008
The perceived rarity of an individual's appearance may promote their removal from wild populations.
“In other instances, the perceived rarity of an individual's appearance may promote their removal from wild populations (Courchamp et al., 2006;Hall et al., 2008;Palazy et al., 2012).”
From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Hall et al., 2008
Cites
Rarity Value and Species Extinction: The Anthropogenic Allee Effect
Courchamp, F., Angulo, E., Rivalan, P., Hall, R. J., Signoret, L., Bull, L., & Meinard, Y. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040415 · Cited by 650 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Rarity itself makes the species more desirable Demand curve shifts upwards and/or becomes less elastic as population declines Trophy hunting, e.g., Caprinae (Courchamp et al. 2006); Luxury goods, e.g., caviar (Raymakers 2002) 2.4.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs
Williams, T. D., Kreling, S. E. S., Stanton, L. A., Wilkinson, C. E., Estien, C. O., Schell, C. J., & Carlen, E. J. (2024) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10745-024-00492-7 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“In other instances, the perceived rarity of an individual’s appearance may promote their removal from wild populations (Cour-champ et al., 2006; Hall et al., 2008; Palazy et al., 2012).”
- Authors
- Hall, R. J., Milner‐Gulland, E. J., & Courchamp, F.
- Affiliations
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Richard J.
- Venue
- Conservation Letters
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 75-81
- ISSN
- 1755-263X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139282185
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Conservation Letters (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
- Keywords
- hunting pressure, consumer demand, bioeconomic model, extinction risk, wildlife trade, population dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review