Cited by 34Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismDrug-Induced Adverse Reactions

Statin Myopathy: A Lipid Clinic Experience on the Tolerability of Statin Rechallenge

Fung, En C., Crook, Martin A.·2012·Cardiovascular Therapeutics

Abstract

Introduction Statin myopathy is a generally encountered side effect of statin usage. Both muscle symptoms and a raised serum creatine kinase (CK) are used in case definition, but these are common manifestations of other conditions, which may not be statin related. Statin rechallenge assuming no contraindication in selected cases is an option before considering a different class of lipid-lowering agent. Aims We aim to characterize retrospectively the patients referred to our Lipid Clinic with a diagnosis of statin myopathy. The tolerability of different statins was assessed to determine a strategy for rechallenging statins in such patients in the future. Results Patients with statin myopathy constitute 10.2% of our Lipid Clinic workload. They are predominantly female (62.0%), Caucasian (63.9%), with a mean age of 58.3 years and mean body mass index (BMI) of 29.3 kg/m(2). The serum CK and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were statistically higher compared to patients with statin intolerances with no muscular component or CK elevations. Secondary causes of statin myopathy were implicated in 2.7% of cases. Following statin myopathy to simvastatin we found no statistical difference between the tolerability rates between atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin. Fibrates, cholestyramine, and ezetimibe were statistically better tolerated in these patients. Conclusions Statin rechallenge is a real treatment option in patients with statin myopathy. Detailed history…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2011.00267.x

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fung, E. C., & Crook, M. A.
Affiliations
University Hospital Lewisham (GB)
Corresponding author
Fung, En C.
Venue
Cardiovascular Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
30
Issue
5
Pages
e212-8
ISSN
  • 1755-5914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1755-5922
OpenAlex
W1484225384
Cited by
34
References
5
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
Keywords
statin-induced myopathy, statin rechallenge, statin intolerance, simvastatin, rosuvastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, atorvastatin, creatine kinase elevation, muscle symptoms, lipid-lowering drugs, fibrates, ezetimibe, cholestyramine, tolerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anticholesteremic Agents, Creatine Kinase, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscular Diseases, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Simvastatin, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review