The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil
Abstract
Summary: Several reports have highlighted that forest soil samples are more phylum‐rich than agricultural soil samples. However, little is known about the structure and richness of the bacterial communities in forest soil. Using high‐throughput next generation 454 pyrosequencing, we deeply investigated the diversity of bacterial communities colonizing the oak rhizosphere niche and the surrounding soil. From three spatially independent soil samples, we obtained over 300 000 partial 16S rRNA gene sequences. The most abundant bacterial groups were the Acidobacteria , Proteobacteria and unclassified bacteria. Multifactorial analysis of the relative proportions of the different phyla revealed a net differentiation of the bacterial communities present in the rhizosphere and soil environments, suggesting an oak rhizosphere effect. Significantly more β‐, γ‐ and unclassified Proteobacteria inhabited the rhizosphere when compared with the surrounding soil. Conversely, significantly more unclassified bacteria were detected in the bulk soil than in the rhizosphere, demonstrating that the soil remains a challenging reservoir of complexity. This work increases our understanding of the niche effect on bacterial diversity and on the rare phylogenetic groups inhabiting the soil.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities
Fierer, N., & Jackson, R. B. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507535103 · Cited by 5,711
Dethlefsen, L., Huse, S., Sogin, M. L., & Relman, D. A. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060280 · Cited by 2,361
Jones, R. T., Robeson, M. S., Lauber, C. L., Hamady, M., Knight, R., & Fierer, N. (2009) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2008.127 · Cited by 1,230
Cited by
Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants
Bulgarelli, D., Schlaeppi, K., Spaepen, S., van Themaat, E. V. L., & Schulze-Lefert, P. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120106 · Cited by 3,308
Impact of Next-Generation Sequencing Technology in Plant–Microbe Interaction Study
Kumari, A., Sumer, S., Jalan, B., Nongbri, P. L., & Laskar, M. A. (2017) · Microbial Applications Vol.1 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52666-9_13 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Uroz, S., Buée, M., Murat, C., Frey‐Klett, P., & Martin, F.
- Venue
- Environmental Microbiology Reports
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03-30
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-288
- ISSN
- 1758-2229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110307024
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00117.x
- The paper
- Uroz, S., Buée, M., Murat, C., Frey‐Klett, P., & Martin, F. (2010). Pyrosequencing reveals a contrasted bacterial diversity between oak rhizosphere and surrounding soil. Environmental Microbiology Reports. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00117.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.