Cited by 67Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesObesity and Health PracticesObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Assessment of obesity beyond body mass index to determine benefit of treatment

Aasheim, E. T., Aylwin, S. J. B., Radhakrishnan, S. T., Sood, A. S., Jovanovic, A., Olbers, T., le Roux, C. W.·2011·Clinical Obesity

Abstract

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Weight or weight loss per se may not indicate health status or health benefit. • There is no gold standard for assessing which patients would benefit most from weight-loss interventions. • The King's Criteria is one of several recently proposed obesity classification systems. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • The King's Criteria can capture health problems related to obesity and health benefits after weight loss. • The King's Criteria is a reproducible scoring system. • Using the King's Criteria may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians from weight loss to health gain. SUMMARY: Body mass index (BMI) alone does not reflect health status in individuals. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria is a clinical tool for the assessment of patients with complex obesity. We assessed the performance of a modified version of the King's Criteria by scoring 144 obese patients before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. We also evaluated inter-observer variability by having 11 clinicians score the same 12 patients. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria comprise nine health domains: Airways, Body mass index, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Economic complications, Functional limitations, Gonadal axis, Health status (perceived), and body Image. For each domain, a person's health is assigned a score of 0 ('normal health'), 1 ('at risk'), 2 ('established disease') or 3 ('advanced disease'). The patient's mean BMI decreased from 48 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 kg m(-2) post surgery. Before surgery, 84% of patients were either in stage 2 ('established disease') or stage 3 ('advanced disease') for one or more domains other than BMI. The modified King's Criteria showed significant health improvements after surgery, with a higher proportion of patients scored in stage 0 ('normal health') within each health domain (P < 0.001 for all). Observers assigned the same score in >75% of cases for all domains except Health status perceived (71%) and body Image (65%). In conclusion the King's Criteria captured morbidity in obese patients and health gains after weight loss. Different clinicians mostly assigned similar scores. The King's Criteria is a clinical tool that may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians towards improving health and not only losing weight. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01112228 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1758-8111.2011.00017.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Scoring and staging systems and treatment algorithms for obesity are based on the presence of other diseases (often referred to as comorbidities), rather than clinical manifestations of obesity itself.

    “Typically, scoring and staging systems and treatment algorithms for obesity are based on the presence of other diseases (often referred to as comorbidities), rather than clinical manifestations of obesity itself.”

    From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

  • Scoring and staging systems of obesity, and policies for coverage of treatments, estimate the clinical effect of obesity on the basis of the presence of other diseases, often referred to as comorbidities.

    “Consistently, scoring and staging systems of obesity, and policies for coverage of treatments, estimate the clinical effect of obesity on the basis of the presence of other diseases, often referred to as comorbidities.16–18”

    From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aasheim, E. T., Aylwin, S. J. B., Radhakrishnan, S. T., Sood, A. S., Jovanovic, A., Olbers, T., & le Roux, C. W.
Affiliations
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Clinical Obesity
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-04
Volume
1
Issue
2-3
Pages
77-84
ISSN
  • 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8111
OpenAlex
W1753811162
Cited by
67
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
obesity classification, bariatric surgery, weight loss, health assessment, body mass index, interobserver variability, obesity-related comorbidities, health gains, body image, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review