Assessment of obesity beyond body mass index to determine benefit of treatment
Abstract
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Weight or weight loss per se may not indicate health status or health benefit. • There is no gold standard for assessing which patients would benefit most from weight-loss interventions. • The King's Criteria is one of several recently proposed obesity classification systems. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • The King's Criteria can capture health problems related to obesity and health benefits after weight loss. • The King's Criteria is a reproducible scoring system. • Using the King's Criteria may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians from weight loss to health gain. SUMMARY: Body mass index (BMI) alone does not reflect health status in individuals. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria is a clinical tool for the assessment of patients with complex obesity. We assessed the performance of a modified version of the King's Criteria by scoring 144 obese patients before and 1 year after bariatric surgery. We also evaluated inter-observer variability by having 11 clinicians score the same 12 patients. The King's Obesity Staging Criteria comprise nine health domains: Airways, Body mass index, Cardiovascular disease, Diabetes, Economic complications, Functional limitations, Gonadal axis, Health status (perceived), and body Image. For each domain, a person's health is assigned a score of 0 ('normal health'), 1 ('at risk'), 2 ('established disease') or 3 ('advanced disease'). The patient's mean BMI decreased from 48 ± 7 to 37 ± 7 kg m(-2) post surgery. Before surgery, 84% of patients were either in stage 2 ('established disease') or stage 3 ('advanced disease') for one or more domains other than BMI. The modified King's Criteria showed significant health improvements after surgery, with a higher proportion of patients scored in stage 0 ('normal health') within each health domain (P < 0.001 for all). Observers assigned the same score in >75% of cases for all domains except Health status perceived (71%) and body Image (65%). In conclusion the King's Criteria captured morbidity in obese patients and health gains after weight loss. Different clinicians mostly assigned similar scores. The King's Criteria is a clinical tool that may help shift the focus of patients and clinicians towards improving health and not only losing weight. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01112228 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scoring and staging systems and treatment algorithms for obesity are based on the presence of other diseases (often referred to as comorbidities), rather than clinical manifestations of obesity itself.
“Typically, scoring and staging systems and treatment algorithms for obesity are based on the presence of other diseases (often referred to as comorbidities), rather than clinical manifestations of obesity itself.”
From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Scoring and staging systems of obesity, and policies for coverage of treatments, estimate the clinical effect of obesity on the basis of the presence of other diseases, often referred to as comorbidities.
“Consistently, scoring and staging systems of obesity, and policies for coverage of treatments, estimate the clinical effect of obesity on the basis of the presence of other diseases, often referred to as comorbidities.16–18”
From Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Effect of BMI on Lifetime Risk for Diabetes in the U.S.
Narayan, K. M. V., Boyle, J. P., Thompson, T. J., Gregg, E. W., & Williamson, D. F. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-2544 · Cited by 510 · see citing works
Association between Obesity during Pregnancy and Increased Use of Health Care
Chu, S. Y., Bachman, D. J., Callaghan, W. M., Whitlock, E. P., Dietz, P. M., Berg, C. J., O'Keeffe-Rosetti, M., Bruce, F. C., & Hornbrook, M. C. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0706786 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Definition and diagnostic criteria of clinical obesity
Rubino, F., Cummings, D. E., Eckel, R. H., Cohen, R. V., Wilding, J. P. H., Brown, W. A., Stanford, F. C., Batterham, R. L., Farooqi, I. S., Farpour-Lambert, N. J., et al. (2025) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(24)00316-4 · Cited by 1,811 · see citing works
Miras, A. D., Pérez-Pevida, B., Aldhwayan, M., Kamocka, A., McGlone, E. R., Al-Najim, W., Chahal, H., Batterham, R. L., McGowan, B., Khan, O., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(19)30157-3 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission on the Definition and Diagnosis of Clinical Obesity
Rubino, F., Batterham, R. L., Koch, M., Mingrone, G., le Roux, C. W., Farooqi, I. S., Farpour-Lambert, N., Gregg, E. W., & Cummings, D. E. (2023) · The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/s2213-8587(23)00058-x · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Alabduljabbar, K., Alsaqaaby, M., Neff, K. J., Crotty, M., & le Roux, C. W. (2023) · Endocrine · doi:10.1007/s12020-023-03534-0 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aasheim, E. T., Aylwin, S. J. B., Radhakrishnan, S. T., Sood, A. S., Jovanovic, A., Olbers, T., & le Roux, C. W.
- Affiliations
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Venue
- Clinical Obesity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 77-84
- ISSN
- 1758-8103 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-8111
- OpenAlex
- W1753811162
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Obesity (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Keywords
- obesity classification, bariatric surgery, weight loss, health assessment, body mass index, interobserver variability, obesity-related comorbidities, health gains, body image, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review