The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Small Firms, the Informal Sector, and the Devil's Deal
Open accessAbstract
Small Firms, the Informal Sector, and the Devil's Deal 1By Judith Tendler Everybody loves small firms.Whether big donors or small, bilateral or multilateral.Whether left or right, government or non-government, practitioners or academics, myself included.Small firms have even gained a prestigious place in the firmament of social policy, where microcredit and other small-firm programs are seen as forming a safety net into which the poor can gently fall.But this is exactly where the trouble begins, and that's what this article is about.Over the last decade or so, myriad programs, projects, and policy reforms have focused attention on informal-sector firms (IS) and small firms (SF) in general, as part of a broader social-policy agenda of reducing poverty and unemployment.2 Despite this welcome attention, many planners in developing countries nevertheless continue to view SF/IS programs as "only" welfare, rather than the stuff of "serious" economic development.The particular form taken by SF/IS support in many countries reinforces this view, as explained below, as does the way SF/IS support is often embedded in politics.This jeopardises certain benefits, ironically, that we hold crucial to the current agenda of reducing poverty and unemployment: greater observance by firms of environmental and labour regulations, sustained increases in efficiency and productivity in local economies and, as a result, improvement in the quantity and quality of jobs.I was first struck with the darker side of small-firm and informal -sector support when interviewing economic-development officials in the Brazilian state of Pernambuco.I was curious to
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“That sector is hard to tax (Tendler 2002; Bird and Wallace 2003; Kloeden 2006).”
From Tax And Development: Donor Support To Strengthen Tax Systems In Developing Countries (2014) · cites this paper as Tendler 2002
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- jeopardise its support among the Owambo-speaking majority; "The Politics of Revenue Mobilisation: Explaining Continuity in Namibian Tax Policies," Forum for Development Studies (No.1, June 2001, p. 142). Italian political scientists studying Italy's postwar period have pointed explicitly to the importance of "[clientelist generosity -in the form of regulation to protect small business, a lax approach to tax collection for the self-employed, and so on -was systematically directed at these groups"; see Jonathan Hopkin and Alfio Mastropaolo, "From patronage to clientelism: comparing the Italian and Spanish experiences," Chapter 7 in Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation: the European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective, edited by Simona Piattoni (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001). Suzanne Berger's work on this same subject in Italy and France is cited in the following note, #6. For an interpretation of small-firm politics in the U.S. economy as affecting viewpoints and policies, see Charles Brown, James Hamilton, and James Medoff, Employers Large and Small (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990).
- Using the small-firm sector to maintain employment and the social peace is not unique to the current period, or to less-developed countries. In work on the political economy of industrial policy in France and Italy, published more than 20 years ago, the political scientist Suzanne Berger explicitly linked the small firm programs and regulations that developed in France and Italy during the 1970s to the simultaneous pursuit of a large-firm industrialisation strategy by those very same governments. She had posed the question of why two countries that had so explicitly pursued a large -firm modernisation industrial policy could at the same time have enacted such pro-small firm legislation and assistance. It is from her work that I take the term, "keeping the social peace." See, "The Uses of the Traditional Sector in Italy: Why Declining Classes Survive," in: The Petite Bourgeoisie, edited by Frank Bechafer and Brian Elliot, pp. 71-89 (New York: Saint Martin's Press, 1981); and "The Traditional Sector in France and Italy," in: Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies, edited by Suzanne Berger and Michael Piore (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980),Chapter 4, pp. 88-131.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tax And Development: Donor Support To Strengthen Tax Systems In Developing Countries
Fjeldstad, O. (2014) · Public Administration and Development · doi:10.1002/pad.1676 · Cited by 96
“A large share of the economic activity in poor countries is located within the informal sector.6 That sector is hard to tax (Tendler, 2002; Bird and Wallace, 2003).”
Coslovsky, S. V. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.07.012 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Tendler, J.
- Corresponding author
- Tendler, Judith
- Venue
- IDS Bulletin
- Publisher
- Institute of Development Studies
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0265-5012 (ISSN-L)
- 1759-5436
- OpenAlex
- W2159101248
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 5 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 13.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- IDS Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Local Economic Development and Planning
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Education and Labor Relations
- Keywords
- small business, informal economy, microcredit, poverty reduction, unemployment, economic development policy, environmental regulation, labor market regulation, productivity, job creation, politics of development, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Small Firms, the Informal Sector, and the Devil's Deal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00035.x
- The paper
- Tendler, J. (2002). Small Firms, the Informal Sector, and the Devil's Deal. IDS Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2002.tb00035.x
