Cited by 29

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stimulating Demand for Research Evidence: What Role for Capacity-building?

Newman, Kirsty, Fisher, Catherine, Shaxson, Louise·2012·IDS Bulletin

Abstract

There has been a great deal of interest in recent years in supporting evidence?informed policymaking in developing countries. In particular, there have been efforts to build the capacity of researchers and research intermediaries to supply appropriately packaged research information (for example in the form of policy briefs) to policymakers. While supply of research information is important, it will only be used to inform policy if it is accessed, valued and understood by policymakers. In this article, we discuss our understanding of demand for research from policymakers; the capacities which underlie it; and how these might be supported.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2012.00358.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Alatas, 2000, ‘Intellectual Imperialism: Definition, Traits, and Problems’, Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, 28, 1
  2. Booth, 2011, Aid Effectiveness: Bringing Country Ownership (and Politics) Back In
  3. Broadbent, 2012, Politics of Research-based Evidence in African Policy Debates: Synthesis of Case Study Findings
  4. Carden, 2009, Knowledge to Policy: Making the Most of Development Research
  5. CHSRF, 2005, Is Research Working for You? A Self-assessment Tool and Discussion Guide for Health Services and Policy Organizations
  6. Clarke, 2010, IDS Bulletin, 41, 3
  7. Conway, 2010, Science and Innovation for Development
  8. Datta, 2011, The Political Economy of Policy-making in Indonesia: Opportunities for Improving the Demand for and Use of Knowledge
  9. DFID, 2011, Operational Plan 2011-2015
  10. Johnson, 2008, Legislative Oversight and Budgeting: A World Perspective
  11. Jones, 2009, Policy-making as Discourse: A Review of Recent Knowledge-to-policy Literature
  12. Jones, 2012, Knowledge, Policy and Power in International Development, 10.2307/j.ctt1t898vh · DOI
  13. Kingdon, 2010, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies
  14. Land, 2009, Capacity Development: Between Planned Interventions and Emergent Processes
  15. Porter, 2010, What Shapes the Influence Evidence has on Policy? The Role of Politics in Research Utilisation
  16. Salih, 2006, African Parliaments: Between Governments and Governance
  17. Shaxson, 2009, Developing an Evidence-based Approach to Environmental Policy Making: Insights from Defra's Evidence and Innovation Strategy
  18. Stone, 2002, ‘Using Knowledge: The Dilemmas of “Bridging Research and Policy”’, Compare, 32, 10.1080/0305792022000007454 · DOI
  19. Taig, 2004, The Development and Use of Scientific Advice in Defra
  20. Uneke , Chikozie Jesse Ebeh Ezeoha , Abel Ndukwe , Chinwendu Daniel Gold Oyibo , Patrick Onwe , Friday 2012 ‘Promotion of Evidence-informed Health Policymaking in Nigeria: Bridging the Gap between Researchers and Policymakers’ Global Public Health http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22394290 · DOI
  21. Weyrauch, 2011, Sound Expectations: From Impact Evaluations to Policy Change
  22. Young, 2009, Helping Researchers become Policy Entrepreneurs

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Newman, K., Fisher, C., & Shaxson, L.
Venue
IDS Bulletin
Published
2012-09
Volume
43
Issue
5
Pages
17-24
ISSN
0265-5012
Cited by
29
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review