The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COMPETITIVE PRIORITIES: INVESTIGATING THE NEED FOR TRADE‐OFFS IN OPERATIONS STRATEGY
Abstract
A heated debate continues over the need for trade‐offs in operations strategy. Some researchers call for plants to focus on a single manufacturing capability and devote their limited resources accordingly, while others claim that advanced manufacturing technology (amt) enables concurrent improvements in quality, cost, flexibility, and delivery. Yet there is little empirical evidence for or against the trade‐off model. In response, this study addresses the question: “To what extent do manufacturing plants view competitive priorities as trade‐offs?” We employ survey data collected from managers and operators in 110 plants that have recently implemented AMT. Our findings suggest that trade‐offs remain. However, perceived differences in competitive priorities are subtle and may vary across levels of the plant hierarchy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001 · Cited by 612
Operational capabilities: the secret ingredient
Wu, S. J., Melnyk, S. A., & Flynn, B. B. (2010) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2010.00294.x · Cited by 263
Backshoring strategy and the adoption of Industry 4.0: Evidence from Europe
Ancarani, A., Di Mauro, C., & Mascali, F. (2019) · Journal of World Business · doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.04.003 · Cited by 248
Terjesen, S., Patel, P. C., & Covin, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.004 · Cited by 158
Kumar, V., Jabarzadeh, Y., Jeihouni, P., & Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-05-2019-0209 · Cited by 97
Lim, S. F. W. T., & Srai, J. S. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-12-2016-0733 · Cited by 92
Hong, J., Guo, P., Deng, H., & Quan, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108147 · Cited by 41
Pozo, H., Roque da Silva, O., & Tachizawa, T. (2017) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2017.1405718 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- BOYER, K. K., & LEWIS, M. W.
- Venue
- Production and Operations Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-20
- ISSN
- 1059-1478 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-5956
- OpenAlex
- W2096056122
- Cited by
- 599
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
