Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The ARRIVE guidelines were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.
“The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research.”
From The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research (2020) · cites this paper as [29]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 · Cited by 5,939 · see citing works
Self-citationSmits, A., Annaert, P., Cavallaro, G., De Cock, P. A. J. G., de Wildt, S. N., Kindblom, J. M., Lagler, F. B., Moreno, C., Pokorna, P., Schreuder, M. F., et al. (2022) · British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/bcp.14958 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Wang, J.-Q., Qi, R.-R., Zhou, W., Tang, Y.-F., Pan, L.-L., & Cai, Y.-L. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124203 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kilkenny, C., Browne, W. J., Cuthill, I. C., Emerson, M., & Altman, D. G.
- Affiliations
- National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research (GB)
- Venue
- Veterinary Clinical Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-31
- ISSN
- 0275-6382 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-165X
- OpenAlex
- W4230399767
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 5.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Veterinary Clinical Pathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- ARRIVE guidelines, animal research reporting, reporting quality, animal experimentation, biology research, reporting guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Animal Husbandry, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Peer Review, Periodicals as Topic, Publishing, Quality Control, Research Design, Guidelines as Topic, Animal Experimentation, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
