Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) Score: A Severity of Illness Stratification System for Hospitalized Dogs

Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., Dewey, C.·2010·Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine

Abstract

Background: Objective risk stratification models are used routinely in human critical care medicine. Applications include quantitative and objective delineation of illness severity for patients enrolled in clinical research, performance benchmarking, and protocol development for triage and therapeutic management. Objective: To develop an accurate, validated, and user-friendly model to stratify illness severity by mortality risk in hospitalized dogs. Animals: Eight hundred and ten consecutive intensive care unit (ICU) admissions of dogs at a veterinary teaching hospital. Methods: Prospective census cohort study. Data on 55 management, physiological, and biochemical variables were collected within 24 hours of admission. Data were randomly divided, with 598 patient records used for logistic regression model construction and 212 for model validation. Results: Patient mortality was 18.4%. Ten-variable and 5-variable models were developed to provide both a high-performance model and model maximizing accessibility, while maintaining good performance. The 10-variable model contained creatinine, WBC count, albumin, SpO2, total bilirubin, mentation score, respiratory rate, age, lactate, and presence of free fluid in a body cavity. Area under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) on the construction data set was 0.93, and on the validation data set was 0.91. The 5-variable model contained glucose, albumin, mentation score, platelet count, and lactate. AUROC on the construction data set was 0.87, and on the validation data set was 0.85. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Two models are presented that enable allocation of an accurate and user-friendly illness severity index for dogs admitted to an ICU. These models operate independent of primary diagnosis, and have been independently validated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0552.x

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Metadata

Authors
Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., & Dewey, C.
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
1034-1047
ISSN
  • 0891-6640 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1676
OpenAlex
W1511657256
Cited by
252
References
13
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) Score: A Severity of Illness Stratification System for Hospitalized Dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0552.x
The paper
Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., & Dewey, C. (2010). The Acute Patient Physiologic and Laboratory Evaluation (APPLE) Score: A Severity of Illness Stratification System for Hospitalized Dogs. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-1676.2010.0552.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.