The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Practical Politics of Knowing: State Environmental Knowledge and Local Political Economy*
Abstract
Abstract: Study of local environmental knowledge has led to a general critique of state epistemology, positing a controlling, official knowledge that crushes competing accounts of nature. Skeptical of that claim, in this paper I assess the differences between state and local knowledge empirically, using a case study of the Kumbhalgarh Wildlife Sanctuary in Rajasthan, India, to explore the way knowledge varies across class, caste, gender, and affiliation within the state forest bureaucracy. The results show that state versus local knowing is not the most meaningful division in epistemology, and that it is the daily struggle over resources in local political economy that gives rise to contending accounts of nature and environmental change. The conclusions further point to knowledge alliances between state and local actors that render certain claims powerful and so determine natural resource management policy and direct landscape change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
Agrawal, A. (1995) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.1995.tb00560.x · Cited by 2,189
Misreading the African Landscape: Society and Ecology in a Forest-Savanna Mosaic
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139164023 · Cited by 1,037
Cited by
Common Property Institutions and Sustainable Governance of Resources
Agrawal, A. (2001) · World Development · doi:10.1016/s0305-750x(01)00063-8 · Cited by 2,025
Advancing a Political Ecology of Global Environmental Discourses
Adger, W. N., Benjaminsen, T. A., Brown, K., & Svarstad, H. (2001) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00222 · Cited by 782
Agrawal, A. (2005) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/427122 · Cited by 728
First World Political Ecology: Lessons from the Wise Use Movement
McCarthy, J. (2002) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1068/a3526 · Cited by 373
Limited effects of tree planting on forest canopy cover and rural livelihoods in Northern India
Coleman, E. A., Schultz, B., Ramprasad, V., Fischer, H., Rana, P., Filippi, A. M., Güneralp, B., Ma, A., Rodriguez Solorzano, C., Guleria, V., et al. (2021) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00761-z · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Robbins, P.
- Venue
- Economic Geography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 126-144
- ISSN
- 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8287
- OpenAlex
- W2005829641
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Practical Politics of Knowing: State Environmental Knowledge and Local Political Economy*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00137.x
- The paper
- Robbins, P. (2000). The Practical Politics of Knowing: State Environmental Knowledge and Local Political Economy*. Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2000.tb00137.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.