The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization*
Open accessAbstract
Abstract: The literatures on economic globalization and feminist understandings of global processes have largely remained separate. In this article, our goal is to bring them into productive conversation so that research on globalization can benefit from feminist engagements with globalization. In the first section, which focuses on the conceptual challenges of bringing the economic globalization literature into conversation with feminist analysis, we identify several key exclusions in that literature and propose parallel inclusions that a feminist reading of globalization suggests. Our suggested inclusions relate to the spaces, scales, subjects, and forms of work that research on economic globalization has largely neglected. The second section takes up several key themes in the large body of feminist research on global economic processes, which is also largely absent from the economic globalization literature: the gendering of work, gender and structural adjustment programs, and mobility and diaspora. In the final section, we address the implications of feminist epistemologies and methodologies for research on economic globalization. Here we argue for grounded, collaborative studies that incorporate perspectives of the south as well as the north and that construct understandings of place and the local, as well as space and general global processes; we point to the coconstitution of different geographic scales and highlight the need for studies that cut across them. The article demonstrates how a feminist analysis of globalization entails far more than recognizing the importance of gender; it requires substantial rethinking of how to conceptualize, study, and act in relation to economic globalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Borderlands/La frontera: the new mestiza
Anzaldúa, G. (2017) · Censored · doi:10.1515/9780773551886-027 · Cited by 10,736
Culture sits in places: reflections on globalism and subaltern strategies of localization
Escobar, A. (2001) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/s0962-6298(00)00064-0 · Cited by 1,669
Cited by
Sultana, F. (2015) · ACME · doi:10.14288/acme.v6i3.786 · Cited by 818
Globalized fear? Towards an emotional geopolitics
Pain, R. (2009) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132508104994 · Cited by 438
Power, difference and mobility: feminist advances in migration studies
Silvey, R. (2004) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1191/0309132504ph490oa · Cited by 342
Neoliberalism as discourse: between Foucauldian political economy and Marxian poststructuralism
Springer, S. (2012) · Critical Discourse Studies · doi:10.1080/17405904.2012.656375 · Cited by 295
Embodying the nation-state: Canada’s response to human smuggling
Mountz, A. (2004) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.12.017 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Nagar, R., Lawson, V., McDowell, L., & Hanson, S.
- Venue
- Economic Geography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 78
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-284
- ISSN
- 0013-0095 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-8287
- OpenAlex
- W1982098866
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 72.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00187.x
- The paper
- Nagar, R., Lawson, V., McDowell, L., & Hanson, S. (2002). Locating Globalization: Feminist (Re)readings of the Subjects and Spaces of Globalization*. Economic Geography. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2002.tb00187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.