Cited by 40

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implications for cratering mechanics from a study of the Footwall Breccia of the Sudbury impact structure, Canada

Lakomy, R.·1990·Meteoritics

Abstract

Abstract— The Footwall Breccia layer in the North Range of the Sudbury impact structure is up to 150 m thick. It has been analyzed for several aspects: shock metamorphism of clasts, matrix texture, mineralogy, and geochemistry with respect to major and trace element compositions. The matrix of this heterolithic breccia contains mineral and lithic fragments, which have suffered shock pressures exceeding 10 GPa, along with clasts of breccia dikes originating from the crater basement. The matrix in a zone near the upper contact of the breccia layer is dominated by a dioritic composition with intersertal textures, whereas beneath this zone the matrix is characterized by poikilitic to granular textures and a tonalitic to granitic composition. Major and trace element analyses of adjacent slices of a thin‐slab profile from the breccia show that the matrix is chemically inhomogeneous within a range of 3 mm. The breccia layer has been thermally annealed by the overlying Sudbury Igneous Complex, which is interpreted as a coherent impact melt sheet. The Rb‐Sr isochron age of 1.825 ± 0.021 Ga for the matrix is a cooling age after partial melting of fine grained clastic material by the melt system. Two‐pyroxene thermometry calculations give temperatures in excess of 1000 °C for this thermal overprinting. Clasts were affected by recrystallization, melting, and reactions with the surrounding matrix at that time. The crystallization of the molten matrix resulted in the observed variety of igneous textures. Results of clast population statistics for the Footwall Breccia along with both geochemical considerations and the Sr‐Nd isotopic signature of the matrix indicate that the breccia constituents exclusively derived from the Levack gneiss complex, which forms the local country rock to the breccia layer in the Levack area. K‐feldspar‐rich domains, which tend to replace parts of matrix and felsic gneiss fragments have been formed due to metasomatic activities during the Penokean orogeny, ∼ 1.7 Ga ago. The available observations suggest that the Sudbury structure represents the remnant of a multi‐ring basin with an apparent diameter between 180 and 200 km and a diameter of the transient cavity of about 100 km. For a crater of the size of the Sudbury basin a maximum depth of excavation of ∼21 km and a depth of shock‐melted target rocks of ∼27 km are obtained. In the Sudbury crater, the Footwall Breccia layer represents a part of the uplifted crater floor directly underlying the thick coherent impact melt sheet.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1990.tb00997.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Brockmeyer P., 1989, The origin of the breccias in the lower Onaping Formation, Sudbury structure, (Canada): evidence from petrographic observations and Sr‐Nd isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 20, 113
  2. 10.1093/petrology/5.2.310 · DOI
  3. Card K. D., 1977, Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and petrology of the Huronian Supergroup in the Sudbury‐Espanola area, Ontario Geological Survey, Geosci. Study, 16, 99
  4. CardK. D. ChurchW. R. FranklinJ. M. FrareyM. J. RobertsonJ. A. WestG. F.andYoungG. M.(1972)The Southern Province. InVariation in Tectonic Styles in Canada(eds.R. A.PriceandR. J. W.Douglas) pp.335–380. Geol. Ass. Canada Spec. Paper No. 11.
  5. 10.1126/science.202.4369.743 · DOI
  6. Coats C. J. A., 1984, Ore deposits of the North Range, Onaping‐Levack area, Sudbury, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury structure, 1, 327
  7. 10.1130/SPE190-p143 · DOI
  8. Dence M. R., 1973, Dimensional analysis of impact structures (abstract), Meteoritics, 8, 343
  9. Dence M. R., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 247
  10. 10.1016/0012-821X(89)90035-6 · DOI
  11. Deutsch A., 1990, Sudbury again: New and old isotope data (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 21, 282
  12. Didier J., 1973, Granites and Their Enclaves, 393
  13. 10.1086/626999 · DOI
  14. Dressler B. O., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 97
  15. 10.1016/0016-7037(78)90114-X · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.230.4724.436 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/0016-7037(61)90092-8 · DOI
  18. 10.1139/e68-069 · DOI
  19. 10.1139/e69-045 · DOI
  20. Fleet M. E., 1987, Prograde metamorphism of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Can. Mineral, 25, 499
  21. 10.1029/JB083iB06p02737 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.156.3778.1094 · DOI
  23. 10.1007/BF02596768 · DOI
  24. 10.1139/e75-175 · DOI
  25. GreenmanJ.(1970)The petrology of the footwall breccias in the vicinity of the Strathcona mine Levack Ontario.Ph.D. thesis University of Toronto Canada.
  26. GrieveR. A. F. DenceM. R.andRobertsonP. B.(1977)Cratering processes: As interpreted from the occurrence of impact melts. InImpact and Explosion Cratering(eds.D. J.Roddy R. O.PepinandR. B.Merrill) pp.791–814.
  27. Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Constrains on the formation of ring impact structures, based on terrestrial data, Multi-ring Basins, Proc. Lunar Sci, 12, 37
  28. HewinsR. H.(1971)The petrology of some marginal mafic rocks along the North Range of the Sudbury irruptive.Ph.D. thesis University of Toronto Canada.
  29. 10.1029/JB092iB07p06350 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0016-7037(77)90212-5 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0012-821X(78)90181-4 · DOI
  32. 10.1029/RG018i001p00143 · DOI
  33. Krogh T. E., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 431
  34. LakomyR.(1989)Petrographie Geochemie und Sr‐Nd‐Isotopie der Footwall‐Breccie im Nordteil der Sudbury‐Struktur Kanada.Ph.D. thesis University of Münster FR Germany 156pp.
  35. Lakomy R., 1990, Distribution of impact‐induced phenomena in complex terrestrial impact structures: Implications for transient cavity dimensions (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 21, 676
  36. LangeM. A.andAhrensT. J.(1979)Impact melting early in lunar history. Proc. Lunar Planet. Sci. Conf. 10th 2707–2725.
  37. 10.1029/JB088iS02p0A887 · DOI
  38. Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering. A Geologic Process, 245
  39. Muir T. L., 1984, The Onaping Formation, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 1, 449
  40. Naldrett A. J., 1984, The main mass of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario Geol. Survey, Spec, 1, 235
  41. Naldrett A. J., 1984, The contact Sublayer of the Sudbury Igneous Complex, Ontario Geol. Survey, Spec, 1, 253
  42. Naldrett A. J., 1988, Metallogeny of Basic and Ultrabasic Rocks, 75
  43. 10.1130/SPE190-p103 · DOI
  44. O'Keefe J. D., 1987, Impact crater maximum depth of penetration and excavation (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 18, 744
  45. Palme H., 1980, The meteoritic contamination of terrestrial and lunar impact melts and the problem of indigeous siderophiles in the lunar highlands (abstract), Lunar Planet. Sci, 11, 845
  46. 10.1016/0016-7037(78)90184-9 · DOI
  47. Pattison E. F., 1979, The Sudbury Sublayer, Can. Mineral, 17, 257
  48. Peredery W. V., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 491
  49. Pye E. G., 1984, The Geology and Ore Deposits of the Sudbury Structure, 603
  50. Rao B. V., 1984, Crustal contamination of the Sublayer, Sudbury Igneous Complex: A combined trace element and strontium isotope study, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper, 121, 128
  51. Robertson P. B., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 687
  52. 10.1016/0012-821X(82)90103-0 · DOI
  53. 10.1086/626451 · DOI
  54. Stöffler D., 1977, Research drilling, Nördlingen 1973: Polymict breccias, crater basement, and cratering model of the Ries impact structure, Geol. Bavarica, 75, 443
  55. 10.1016/0022-3093(84)90171-6 · DOI
  56. 10.1007/978-3-642-73452-6_25 · DOI
  57. Stöffler D., 1989, Sudbury, Canada: Remnant of the only multi‐ring (?) impact basin on earth, Meteoritics, 24, 328
  58. 10.1016/0012-8252(76)90052-0 · DOI
  59. Schmus W. R., 1965, The geochronology of the Blind River‐Bruce mines area, Ontario, Canada, J. Geol, 73, 775
  60. 10.1007/BF02520213 · DOI
  61. 10.1093/petrology/3.2.238 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lakomy, R.
Venue
Meteoritics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
195-207
ISSN
0026-1114
Cited by
40
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review