The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Constraints on the size of the Vredefort impact crater from numerical modeling
Abstract
Abstract— The Vredefort structure in South Africa was created by a meteorite impact about two billion years ago. Since that time, the crater has been deeply eroded; so to estimate its original size, researchers have had to rely heavily upon comparison to other terrestrial impact structures. Recent estimates of the original crater diameter range from 160 km to as much as 400 km. In this study, we combined the capabilities of both hydrocode and finite‐element modeling, using the former to predict where the pressure of an impact‐generated shock wave would have been high enough to form planar deformation features (PDFs) and shatter cones and the latter to follow the subsequent displacement of these shock isobars during the collapse of the crater. We established constraints on the sizes of the projectile and the transient crater (and, thus, on the size of the final crater) by comparing the observed locations of PDFs around Vredefort to the results of our simulations of impacts by projectiles of various sizes. These simulations indicate that a rocky projectile with a diameter of ∼10 km, impacting vertically at a velocity of 20 km/s generates shock pressures that are consistent with the distribution of PDFs around Vredefort. These projectile parameters correspond to a transient crater ∼80 km in diameter or a final crater ∼120–160 km in diameter. Allowing for uncertainties in our modeling procedures, we consider final craters 120 to 200 km in diameter to be consistent with the observed locations of PDFs at Vredefort. The shock pressure contour corresponding to the formation of shatter cones is almost horizontal near the surface, making the locations of these features less useful constraints on the crater size. However, they may provide a constraint on the amount of erosion that has occurred since the impact.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This estimate of the final crater diameter for Vredefort is closer to that of the model crater diameter of Turtle and Pierazzo (1998) of 120-200 km.”
From Observations and interpretations at Vredefort, Sudbury, and Chicxulub: Towards an empirical model of terrestrial impact basin formation (2008) · cites this paper as Turtle and Pierazzo (1998)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Bathe K., 1976, Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis., 528
- 10.1016/0019-1035(89)90129-2 · DOI
- Birch F., 1966, Handbook of Physical Constants, 160
- Corner B., 1990, Relationships between the Vredefort Structure and the Witwatersrand Basin within the tectonic framework of the Kaapvaal craton as interpreted from regional gravity and aeromagnetic data, Tectonophysics, 171, 46, 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90089-Q · DOI
- 10.1086/625423 · DOI
- Fletcher P., 1989, Some notes and speculations on the pseudotachylites in the Witwatersrand Basin and Vredefort dome, South Africa, South African Journal of Geology, 92, 223
- 10.1002/gj.3350300311 · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.1978.0008 · DOI
- 10.1080/00206819409465452 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00384743 · DOI
- Grieve R. A. F., 1981, Multi‐Ring Basins, 37
- 10.1016/0040-1951(90)90098-S · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02049.x · DOI
- Hall A. L., 1925, The Vredefort Mountain Land in the Southern Transvaal and the Northern Orange Free State, Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, 24, 1
- Hargraves R. B., 1961, Shatter cones in the rocks of the Vredefort ring, Trans. Geol. Soc. South Africa, 64, 147
- 10.1016/0040-1951(91)90106-3 · DOI
- Henkel H., 1996, Integrated gravity and magnetic modeling of the Vredefort impact structure‐Reinterpretation of the Witwatersrand Basin as the erosional remnant of an impact basin, 299
- Hörz F., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 243
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(96)00180-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/RG025i008p01680 · DOI
- Koeberl C., 1996, Re‐Os isotope and geochemical study of the Vredefort Granophyre: Clues to the origin of the Vredefort Structure, South Africa, Geology, 24, 913, 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0913:ROIAGS>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0040-1951(94)90137-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb20415.x · DOI
- Maxwell D., 1975, Modeling of Cratering, Close‐in Displacements, and Ejecta., 101, 10.21236/ADA016259 · DOI
- McCarthy T. S., 1990, Geological studies related to the origin of the Witwatersrand Basin and its mineralization‐An introduction and a strategy for research and exploration, South African Journal of Geology, 93, 1
- 10.1002/pssb.19670190216 · DOI
- Melosh H. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 1245
- 10.1029/JB087iB01p00371 · DOI
- Melosh H. J., 1989, Impact Cratering: A Geologic Process., 245
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1980.tb04812.x · DOI
- 10.1029/JB086iB11p10653 · DOI
- 10.1006/icar.1997.5713 · DOI
- Reimold W. U., 1991, The Vredefort structure under discussion, South African Journal of Science, 87, 412
- Robertson P. B., 1968, Shock Metamorphism of Natural Materials, 433
- Roddy D. J., 1977, Impact and Explosion Cratering, 715
- 10.1016/0012-8252(94)90001-9 · DOI
- Schmids M., 1977, Superplastic flow in fine‐grained limestone, Tectonophysics, 43, 257, 10.1016/0040-1951(77)90120-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0734-743X(87)90069-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/JB086iB11p10701 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-9268(96)00043-5 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1994.tb00670.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1997.tb01242.x · DOI · Paper page
- Thompson S. L., 1979, CSQIII An Eulerian finite differences program for two‐dimensional material response: Users manual, 87
- Thompson S. L., 1972, Improvements in the Chart D radiation‐hydrodynamic code III: Revised analytical equation of state, 119
Cited by
Sorted by citations
GRIEVE, R. A. F., REIMOLD, W. U., MORGAN, J., RILLER, U., & PILKINGTON, M. (2008) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2008.tb01086.x · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- TURTLE, E. P., & PIERAZZO, E.
- Venue
- Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 483-490
- ISSN
- 1086-9379
- 1945-5100
- Cited by
- 36
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review