The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
“New” lunar meteorites: Implications for composition of the global lunar surface, lunar crust, and the bulk Moon
Abstract
Abstract— New data for lunar meteorites and a synthesis of literature data have significant implications for the interpretation of global Th data and for the Moon's bulk composition. As presently calibrated (Prettyman et al. 2002), the Lunar Prospector gamma‐ray data imply that the average global surface Th = 1.58 μg/g. However, that calibration yields implausibly high concentrations for the three most Th‐poor documented sampling sites, it extrapolates to a nonzero Lunar Prospector Th, ˜0.7 μg/g, at zero sample Th, and it results in a misfit toward too‐high Th when compared with the global regolith Th spectrum as constrained using mainly lunaite regolith breccias. Another problem is manifested by Th versus K systematics. Ground truth data plot consistently to the high‐Th/K side of the Prospector data trend, offset by a factor of 1.2. A new calibration is proposed that represents a compromise between the Th levels indicated by ground truth constraints and the Prettyman et al. (2002) calibration. Conservatively assuming that the Th versus K issue is mostly a K problem, the average global surface Th is estimated to be ˜1.35 μg/g. The Moon's remarkable global asymmetry in KREEP abundance is even more pronounced than previously supposed. The surface Th concentration ratio between the hemisphere antipodal to the Procellarum basin and the hemisphere centered on Procellarum is reduced to 0.24 in the new calibration. This extreme disparity is most simply interpreted as a consequence of Procellarum's origin at a time when the Moon still contained at least a thin residual layer of a global magma ocean. Allowing for diminution of Th with depth, the extrapolated bulk crustal Th is ˜0.73 μg/g. Further extrapolation to bulk Moon Th yields ˜0.07 μg/g, which is nearly identical to the consensus estimate for Earth's primitive mantle. Assuming chondritic proportionality among refractory lithophile elements implies Al 2 O 3 of approximately 3.8 wt%. The Moon's bulk mantle mg ratio is only weakly constrained by seismic and mare‐basaltic data. KREEP‐and mare‐free lunaite regolith samples, other thoroughly polymict lunar meteorites, and a few KREEP‐free Apollo highland samples manifest a remarkable anticorrelation on a plot of Al 2 O 3 versus mg. This trend implies that an important component of the Moon is highly magnesian. The bulk Moon is inferred to have an Earth‐like oxide mg ratio of ˜87–88 mol%. The close resemblance between the bulk Moon and Earth's primitive mantle extends to moderately volatile elements, most clearly Mn. Unless major proportions of Cr and V are sequestered into deep mantle spinel, remarkably Earth‐like depletions (versus chondrites) are also inferred for bulk Moon Cr and V.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Origin of the Moon in a giant impact near the end of the Earth's formation
Canup, R. M., & Asphaug, E. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35089010 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 2×
“Most models of the Moon’s origin assume it is the byproduct of a giant impact involving the Earth as a major contributor to the orbiting debris that eventually forms the Moon (e.g., Canup and Asphaug 2001).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Warren, P. H.
- Venue
- Meteoritics & Planetary Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 477-506
- ISSN
- 1086-9379 (ISSN-L)
- 1945-5100
- OpenAlex
- W2043591340
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “New” lunar meteorites: Implications for composition of the global lunar surface, lunar crust, and the bulk Moon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00395.x
- The paper
- Warren, P. H. (2005). “New” lunar meteorites: Implications for composition of the global lunar surface, lunar crust, and the bulk Moon. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-5100.2005.tb00395.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.