Cited by 226Oral microbiology and periodontitis researchInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and ManagementStreptococcal Infections and Treatments

Streptococcus mitis: walking the line between commensalism and pathogenesis

Mitchell, J.·2011·Molecular Oral Microbiology

Abstract

Summary: Streptococcus mitis is a viridans streptococcus and a normal commensal of the human oropharynx. However, S. mitis can escape from this niche and cause a variety of infectious complications including infective endocarditis, bacteraemia and septicaemia. It uses a variety of strategies to effectively colonize the human oropharynx. These include expression of adhesins, immunoglobulin A proteases and toxins, and modulation of the host immune system. These various colonization factors allow S. mitis to compete for space and nutrients in the face of its more pathogenic oropharyngeal microbial neighbours. However, it is likely that in vulnerable immune‐compromised patients S. mitis will use the same colonization and immune modulation factors as virulence factors promoting its opportunistic pathogenesis. The recent publication of a complete genome sequence for S. mitis strain B6 will allow researchers to thoroughly investigate which genes are involved in S. mitis host colonization and pathogenesis. Moreover, it will help to give insight into where S. mitis fits in the complicated oral microbiome. This review will discuss the current knowledge of S. mitis factors involved in host colonization, their potential role in virulence and what needs to be done to fully understand how a an oral commensal successfully transitions to a virulent pathogen.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2041-1014.2010.00601.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immunoglobulin A-specific proteases are well known in oral streptococci, such as S. mitis and S. sanguinis.

    “Immunoglobulin A–specific proteases are well known in oral streptococci, such as S. mitis and S. sanguinis,252,253”

    From The dental plaque biofilm matrix (2021) · cites this paper as [252]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, J.
Affiliations
University College Dublin (IE)
Corresponding author
Mitchell, J.
Venue
Molecular Oral Microbiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-18
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
89-98
ISSN
  • 2041-1006 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-1014
OpenAlex
W2148328424
Cited by
226
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Oral Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
FP7 Coordination of Non-Community Research Programmes
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Oral microbiology and periodontitis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Streptococcal Infections and Treatments
Keywords
Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus viridans, commensalism, oropharyngeal colonization, adhesins, toxins, immunomodulation, virulence factors, immunocompromised patients, infective endocarditis, bacteremia, septicemia, oral microbiota, genome sequence
MeSH terms
Humans, Opportunistic Infections, Oropharynx, Streptococcal Infections, Symbiosis, Genome, Bacterial, Immunocompromised Host, Streptococcus mitis, Virulence Factors, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Immunomodulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review