Convergent Pad Polishing of Amorphous Silica
Abstract
A new method of optical polishing termed “ C onvergent P olishing” is demonstrated where a workpiece, regardless of its initial surface figure, will converge to the lap shape in a single iteration. This method of polishing is accomplished by identifying the phenomena that contribute to non‐uniform spatial material removal, and mitigating the non‐uniformity for each phenomenon (except for the workpiece‐lap mismatch due to the workpiece surface shape). The surface mismatch at the interface between the workpiece and lap causes a spatial and time varying pressure differential which decreases with removal, thus allowing the workpiece to converge to the shape of the lap. In this study, fused (amorphous) silica workpieces are polished using ceria slurry on various polyurethane pads. Polishing parameters were systematically controlled to prevent various sources of non‐uniform material removal which include: (i) moment force, (ii) viscoelastic lap relaxation, (iii) kinematics, (iv) pad wear, and (v) workpiece bending. The last two are described herein. With these mitigations, removal uniformity has been demonstrated to within 1.0 μm over the surface after 83 μm of material removal corresponding to a within workpiece non‐uniformity ( WIWNU ) of <1.2%. Also, convergence has been demonstrated down to 0.18 ± 0.04 μm peak‐to‐valley flatness on 100 mm‐sized workpieces.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The smoothing mechanism is based on the workpiece-lap (or workpiece-tool) mismatch and the convergence concept, where greater pressure (and hence material removal) occurs at the taller surface height locations on the workpiece relative to the lower surface height locations, resulting in a reduction of overall height variations with polishing.
“The smoothing mechanism is based on the workpiece-lap (or workpiece-tool) mismatch and the convergence concept, where greater pressure (and hence material removal) occurs at the taller surface height locations on the workpiece relative to the lower surface height locations resulting in a reduction of overall height variations with polishing[21-24].”
From Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smoothing tool design and performance during subaperture glass polishing
Suratwala, T., Tham, G., Steele, R., Wong, L., Menapace, J., Ray, N., & Bauman, B. (2023) · Applied Optics · doi:10.1364/ao.482739 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Suratwala, T., Steele, R., Feit, M., Desjardin, R., & Mason, D.
- Affiliations
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Suratwala, Tayyab
- ORCID
- Suratwala, Tayyab
- Venue
- International Journal of Applied Glass Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 14-28
- ISSN
- 2041-1286 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-1294
- OpenAlex
- W2164856751
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Applied Glass Science (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Laser Material Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- optical polishing, amorphous silica, fused silica, ceria slurry, polyurethane polishing pad, material removal uniformity, pad wear, flatness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review