Cited by 658Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesEcosystem dynamics and resilienceFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

A new method for detecting and interpreting biodiversity and ecological community thresholds: Threshold Indicator Taxa ANalysis (TITAN)

Open access
Baker, Matthew E., King, Ryan S.·2010·Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

1. Existing methods for identifying ecological community thresholds are designed for univariate indicators or multivariate dimension-reduction of community structure. Most are insensitive to responses of individual taxa with low occurrence frequencies or highly variable abundances, properties of the vast majority of taxa in community data sets. We introduce Threshold Indicator Taxa ANalysis (TITAN) to detect changes in taxa distributions along an environmental gradient over space or time, and assess synchrony among taxa change points as evidence for community thresholds. 2. TITAN uses indicator species scores to integrate occurrence, abundance and directionality of taxa responses. It identifies the optimum value of a continuous variable, x, that partitions sample units while maximizing taxon-specific scores. Indicator z scores standardize original scores relative to the mean and SD of permuted samples along x, thereby emphasizing the relative magnitude of change and increasing the contributions of taxa with low occurrence frequencies but high sensitivity to the gradient. TITAN distinguishes negative (z−) and positive (z+) taxa responses and tracks cumulative responses of declining [sum(z−)] and increasing [sum(z+)] taxa in the community. Bootstrapping is used to estimate indicator reliability and purity as well as uncertainty around the location of individual taxa and community change points. 3. Using two simulated data sets, TITAN correctly identified taxon and community thr…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2041-210x.2009.00007.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Species-specific thresholds to environmental gradients are influenced by organismal traits and the magnitude of changes.

    “Species‐specific thresholds to environmental gradients are influenced by organismal traits and the magnitude of changes (Baker & King, 2010; Colwell & Rangel, 2009; Swift & Hannon, 2010; Turner, 1989).”
  • Analysis of species-level or functional-group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change.

    “Analysis of species‐level or functional‐group responses allows for estimation of thresholds for major community shifts in response to environmental change (Baker & King, 2010; Brejão et al., 2017; Chen & Olden, 2020).”
  • These shifts often result from changes in an environmental gradient toward less favorable conditions until population threshold responses (tipping points) occur and are indicated by a rapid decline in occurrence and abundance.

    “These shifts often result from changes in an environmental gradient toward less favorable conditions until population threshold responses (tipping points) occur and are indicated by a rapid decline in occurrence and abundance (Baker & King, 2010; Röpke et al., 2017; Sasaki et al., 2008).”
  • Analyses of fish assemblage structures along floodplain environmental gradients show complex patterns, including potential threshold responses.

    “Analyses of fish assemblage structures along floodplain environmental gradients show complex patterns, including potential threshold responses (Baker & King, 2010; Röpke et al., 2017; Sasaki et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baker, M. E., & King, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore County (US)
  • Baylor University (US)
Corresponding author
Baker, Matthew E.
Venue
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-02-01
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
25-37
ISSN
2041-210X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1575831425
Cited by
658
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 81 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Methods in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace Repository (Smithsonian) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park)
Funders
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis, indicator species analysis, change point detection, environmental gradients, indicator reliability, macroinvertebrate communities, phosphorus gradient, urban-rural gradient, rare taxa, conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review