Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 583

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod

Jones, B J, Roberts, D J·1968·Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology

Abstract

A simple modification of the standard rotarod apparatus is described which eliminates the necessity of time-consuming training and consequently gives a truer measure of motor co-ordination since any effects on memory are avoided. The sensitivity and reproducibility of the procedure are much greater than those obtained with constant speed rotarods and less animals are required to obtain statistically significant results.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09743.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 583

Metadata

Authors
Jones, B. J., & Roberts, D. J.
Venue
Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
Published
1968-04-01
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
302-304
ISSN
  • 0022-3573 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-7158
OpenAlex
W1998290119
Cited by
583
References
0
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09743.x
The paper
Jones, B. J., & Roberts, D. J. (1968). The quantitative measurement of motor inco-ordination in naive mice using an accelerating rotarod. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1968.tb09743.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.